3.3 sec in total
595 ms
2.5 sec
209 ms
Welcome to realscientists.org homepage info - get ready to check Realscientists best content right away, or after learning these important things about realscientists.org
Website SEO Checker is a free seo tool which will help you analyse your web page
Visit realscientists.orgWe analyzed Realscientists.org page load time and found that the first response time was 595 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
realscientists.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value4.4 s
75/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
595 ms
678 ms
329 ms
650 ms
511 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Realscientists.org, 11% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (678 ms) belongs to the original domain Realscientists.org.
Page size can be reduced by 13.0 kB (13%)
103.4 kB
90.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Realscientists.org main page is 103.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 60.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 232 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Realscientists needs image optimization as it can save up to 232 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 197 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Realscientists.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (73%)
15
4
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Realscientists. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
realscientists.org
595 ms
realscientists.org
678 ms
jquery.min.js
329 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
650 ms
base.js
511 ms
bootstrap.min.css
672 ms
app.css
506 ms
cookieconsent.latest.min.js
512 ms
css2
48 ms
content.png
168 ms
tags.png
158 ms
link.png
167 ms
speed.png
167 ms
advice.png
167 ms
review.png
167 ms
loader.gif
465 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6eA.ttf
37 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtw.ttf
47 ms
dark-bottom.css
39 ms
realscientists.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
realscientists.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
realscientists.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Realscientists.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Realscientists.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
realscientists.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Realscientists. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: