825 ms in total
36 ms
632 ms
157 ms
Visit rebag.com now to see the best up-to-date Rebag content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rebag.com
Shop expertly-vetted used luxury styles. Sell your items for upfront quotes. Get the best value when you buy & sell at once, paying only the difference.
Visit rebag.comWe analyzed Rebag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 789 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
rebag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value28,850 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value43.6 s
0/100
10%
36 ms
68 ms
78 ms
71 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rebag.com, 32% (6 requests) were made to Staticfiles.rebag.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (326 ms) relates to the external source Staticfiles.rebag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 215.1 kB (44%)
491.3 kB
276.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rebag.com main page is 491.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 253.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 214.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 214.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rebag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 386 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rebag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 386 B or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (60%)
15
6
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rebag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rebag.com
36 ms
rebag.com
68 ms
www.rebag.com
78 ms
sdk.js
71 ms
header_static.style.css
114 ms
jquery.min.js
110 ms
rebag-logo-black@2x.png
165 ms
spendandsave-9-22-desk.jpg
169 ms
popper.min.js
203 ms
vendors--main.js
326 ms
main.js
182 ms
analytics.js
61 ms
sdk.js
9 ms
286 ms
friendbuy.js
71 ms
campaigns.js
50 ms
xhr
27 ms
collect
15 ms
bc-sf-filter-config.script.min.js
27 ms
rebag.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rebag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rebag.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rebag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rebag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rebag.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rebag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: