2.6 sec in total
86 ms
2.2 sec
298 ms
Welcome to receiveroption.com homepage info - get ready to check Receiveroption best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about receiveroption.com
Receiver Software, Echolink, Star track, Neosat, Starsat, 1506g, 1506f, 1506t, 1506tv, 1506lv, Ali3510c, Ali3510d, Sunplus, Gx6605s, 1507g, 1506fv
Visit receiveroption.comWe analyzed Receiveroption.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
receiveroption.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value7.2 s
29/100
10%
Value1,120 ms
23/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
86 ms
67 ms
181 ms
23 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Receiveroption.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (12 requests) were made to Blogger.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 221.0 kB (12%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Receiveroption.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 148.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Receiveroption images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Receiveroption.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (53%)
74
35
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Receiveroption. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
receiveroption.com
86 ms
receiveroption.com
67 ms
www.receiveroption.com
181 ms
3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css
23 ms
js
74 ms
adsbygoogle.js
108 ms
bgdot.png
44 ms
js
39 ms
jquery.min.js
27 ms
css2
43 ms
AVvXsEjDZfGEUwg3vp9PMMWFgNzT9gxn3l566oQNxaA7uy094xjazdWnhzQfyzg6UwRUUSR4-MPDnP--VAN8cv0D159aHvlLp2GIq6Fd8Ddtwqo3AW48V00qK039LeKIXNVgoP2Y9gYomn4-hORvXh2zEGYk3aRbXufodUpGllgPP_iOp-8WnWPmzf3aqxWN=s594
430 ms
1.webp
909 ms
1.jpg
990 ms
1.jpg
878 ms
1.webp
914 ms
1.jpg
906 ms
1.jpg
912 ms
1%20(1).jpg
1420 ms
AVvXsEjrGUq9BMK_1AYYs5miDV1ZJiibysG64UbL-7pa2IYqyYokq7eptOeCNsLgyc-E3NTtWWL8VyBkGg8a-URJW0xZjTQE5DP7GpGFnKCXUDq19ZFxOO7WGQv0Ew65lS_bo0sN1XyrKZVQzBH6HQbumoL9ULSew02pSvItvPgeW-jF6pk_Uvgn9kfPIzVn=w72-h72-p-k-no-nu
1287 ms
AVvXsEiuQyqIqi1Ce9d0XuZVv0a55hwrVLpC9Wh6Te8_WCsrgvB9EAgoqce6dV8Du3li3lvzpwb0g5gKveQYqGEW_n1Or-e7dITHjmKlqX3B1Dfq8x6OXVaX_jz3O2li6gjXjVEpj6LWNOnMAvMetrbv_6RNgWUV9n2xgfkgXwznrU0wS3dLE-aoY_h5O4zT=w72-h72-p-k-no-nu
1176 ms
AVvXsEhu4Tdjul_aZfVx3vo9U3qQqKGgfK1I_G9lPZs6wBiJly3VicNK2mgYfhKRRN4MdCaY16oHt7AqjsyHMu14GpAECjUl_6grkotLtV_bjnFwWlJRh_ga5KcNjuyGRonckJ_qXMDseBxYUaeiJ_wvGlvchCPDuGaU623XCFG_3VYbyCnnvMSNZWF7nsuq=w72-h72-p-k-no-nu
1287 ms
1.PNG
1288 ms
font-awesome.min.css
41 ms
authorization.css
27 ms
css
23 ms
authorization.css
95 ms
show_ads_impl.js
372 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
35 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
50 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
34 ms
repeat-bg.png
22 ms
summary
90 ms
summary
110 ms
www.receiveroption.com
176 ms
zrt_lookup.html
37 ms
share_buttons_20_3.png
21 ms
ads
687 ms
ads
720 ms
ads
354 ms
ads
532 ms
gen_204
144 ms
pixel
144 ms
4594489293594615762
29 ms
abg_lite.js
17 ms
omrhp.js
17 ms
Q12zgMmT.js
26 ms
icon.png
11 ms
window_focus.js
32 ms
qs_click_protection.js
33 ms
ufs_web_display.js
21 ms
62bHydCX.html
98 ms
activeview
101 ms
pixel
106 ms
pixel
105 ms
reactive_library.js
156 ms
ca-pub-2118464472997514
126 ms
XCSEbScD2TvrcCbmOAwzw3FcKGiduMdvSHMNJDgnGcc.js
4 ms
setuid
29 ms
rum
16 ms
pixel
14 ms
pixel
27 ms
rum
25 ms
sodar
175 ms
ads
323 ms
ads
234 ms
pixel
143 ms
9919945211448007336
57 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
79 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
83 ms
gen_204
87 ms
pixel
102 ms
3500903848010807856
59 ms
gen_204
75 ms
pixel
43 ms
pixel
42 ms
sodar2.js
83 ms
activeview
105 ms
um
104 ms
pixel
30 ms
pixel
30 ms
pixel
81 ms
setuid
28 ms
rum
28 ms
um
73 ms
rum
47 ms
runner.html
19 ms
aframe
50 ms
pixel
21 ms
sd
27 ms
pixel
22 ms
receiveroption.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
receiveroption.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
receiveroption.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
![]()
EN
![]()
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Receiveroption.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Receiveroption.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
receiveroption.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Receiveroption. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: