Tools & Wizards About Us
reclaime.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

reclaime.com

ReclaiMe File Recovery Software

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

328 ms

reclaime.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reclaime.com homepage info - get ready to check Reclai Me best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about reclaime.com

Need a smart multipurpose data recovery software? Click here to try ReclaiMe File Recovery software for free and preview your data immediately.

Visit reclaime.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reclaime.com page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reclaime.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reclaime.com

362 ms

reclaime.com

700 ms

www.reclaime.com

345 ms

www.reclaime.com

1058 ms

default

198 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Reclaime.com, 21% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 14% (9 requests) were made to I2.reclaime.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Reclaime.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 326.9 kB (50%)

Content Size

657.0 kB

After Optimization

330.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reclaime.com main page is 657.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 329.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 28.2 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 155 B

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 85.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reclai Me images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 118.8 kB

  • Original 329.0 kB
  • After minification 329.0 kB
  • After compression 210.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.8 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 186.6 kB

  • Original 214.1 kB
  • After minification 208.3 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reclaime.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 186.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (68%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reclai Me. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reclaime.com

reclaime.com

362 ms

reclaime.com

reclaime.com

700 ms

www.reclaime.com

www.reclaime.com

345 ms

www.reclaime.com

www.reclaime.com

1058 ms

default

default

198 ms

oxygen.css

oxygen.css

352 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

862 ms

site.css

site.css

850 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1196 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

1205 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1059 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

905 ms

js

js

64 ms

dc.js

dc.js

86 ms

trustpilot-sign.png

trustpilot-sign.png

710 ms

hard1.png

hard1.png

740 ms

hard2.png

hard2.png

751 ms

hard3.png

hard3.png

753 ms

devices2.png

devices2.png

766 ms

devices4.png

devices4.png

784 ms

cases1.png

cases1.png

783 ms

cases5.png

cases5.png

905 ms

cases3.png

cases3.png

920 ms

hard0.png

hard0.png

722 ms

hard1-1.png

hard1-1.png

736 ms

hard2-1.png

hard2-1.png

766 ms

devices1.png

devices1.png

802 ms

devices3.png

devices3.png

816 ms

cases4.png

cases4.png

874 ms

cases2.png

cases2.png

887 ms

cases6.png

cases6.png

902 ms

logo.png

logo.png

209 ms

video2.png

video2.png

209 ms

recovery1.png

recovery1.png

209 ms

recovery2.png

recovery2.png

182 ms

recovery3.png

recovery3.png

209 ms

recovery4.png

recovery4.png

182 ms

recovery5.png

recovery5.png

401 ms

recovery6.png

recovery6.png

434 ms

sphere.png

sphere.png

432 ms

deco-line-r.png

deco-line-r.png

367 ms

list-image.png

list-image.png

369 ms

back-image.jpg

back-image.jpg

370 ms

deco-line-1l.png

deco-line-1l.png

537 ms

deco-line-1r.png

deco-line-1r.png

539 ms

deco-line-2r.png

deco-line-2r.png

536 ms

deco-dline-l.png

deco-dline-l.png

537 ms

deco-dline-r.png

deco-dline-r.png

571 ms

deco-line-t.png

deco-line-t.png

566 ms

deco-line-b.png

deco-line-b.png

702 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

67 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

212 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

71 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

72 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

77 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

83 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

85 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

88 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

214 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

94 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

145 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

101 ms

Accessibility Review

reclaime.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

reclaime.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reclaime.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reclaime.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reclaime.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reclaime.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reclai Me. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: