2.3 sec in total
88 ms
2.2 sec
60 ms
Visit redeemertemple.com now to see the best up-to-date Redeemer Temple content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about redeemertemple.com
3701 W. 64th Avenue, Arvada, CO 80003 | Redeemer Temple
Visit redeemertemple.comWe analyzed Redeemertemple.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
redeemertemple.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value13,670 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value31.9 s
0/100
10%
88 ms
35 ms
32 ms
31 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Redeemertemple.com, 42% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (281 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 288.1 kB (46%)
622.5 kB
334.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Redeemertemple.com main page is 622.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 367.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 279.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 279.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Redeemer Temple needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)
21
11
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Redeemer Temple. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.redeemertemple.com
88 ms
minified.js
35 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
31 ms
thunderbolt-commons.a475be57.bundle.min.js
21 ms
main.1438a05e.bundle.min.js
106 ms
lodash.min.js
102 ms
react.production.min.js
103 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
107 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
106 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
118 ms
c4bec9_ce839ed6af0b4b349cfb84dc90f68a10~mv2.jpeg
265 ms
bundle.min.js
72 ms
c4bec9_06641a0df7a149b4be4f25e590f2b78f~mv2.jpg
217 ms
c4bec9_c123f00b868248bc97b413bf3b7562f9~mv2.png
197 ms
5D7106AB-A844-4B0A-AEBF-68B625E0798F.jpg
281 ms
apple-app-store-travel-awards-globestamp.png
223 ms
apple-app-store-travel-awards-globestamp.png
192 ms
116 ms
110 ms
107 ms
109 ms
108 ms
107 ms
136 ms
132 ms
129 ms
129 ms
127 ms
126 ms
asimon-aaa-400.woff
10 ms
cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff
4 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
4 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
10 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
18 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
9 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
redeemertemple.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
redeemertemple.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
redeemertemple.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redeemertemple.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Redeemertemple.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
redeemertemple.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Redeemer Temple. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: