Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

reepay.com

Billwerk+ Pay - Your Reliable Payment Gateway

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

758 ms

reepay.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ree Pay content for Denmark. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reepay.com

Billwerk+ Pay - The Reliable Out-of-the-Box Payment Gateway With a 99,99% uptime rate and incredibly fast configuration options, we empower your commerce success. Try for free Billwerk+ Pay - The Re...

Visit reepay.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reepay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reepay.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,050 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.173

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reepay.com

172 ms

reepay.com

278 ms

217 ms

jquery.min.js

196 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

292 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Reepay.com, 94% (117 requests) were made to Billwerk.plus and 5% (6 requests) were made to Matomo.billwerk.plus. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (884 ms) relates to the external source Matomo.billwerk.plus.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (66%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Reepay.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB
  • After compression 215.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 802.0 kB
  • After minification 735.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ree Pay images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 280.5 kB

  • Original 376.1 kB
  • After minification 376.1 kB
  • After compression 95.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 280.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (54%)

Requests Now

115

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ree Pay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

reepay.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

reepay.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

reepay.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reepay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reepay.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ree Pay. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: