3 sec in total
800 ms
1.9 sec
257 ms
Visit reet-result.in now to see the best up-to-date Reet Result content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reet-result.in
REET Result 2015 - REET Admit Card, REET 2015 Answer key PDF and REET Scorecard Merit List. REET latest News Updates.
Visit reet-result.inWe analyzed Reet-result.in page load time and found that the first response time was 800 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
reet-result.in performance score
800 ms
29 ms
82 ms
42 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Reet-result.in, 12% (8 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) belongs to the original domain Reet-result.in.
Page size can be reduced by 532.1 kB (55%)
976.0 kB
443.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Reet-result.in main page is 976.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 675.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reet Result images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 454.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 454.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reet-result.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (59%)
56
23
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reet Result. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reet-result.in
800 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
82 ms
css
42 ms
genericons.css
118 ms
style.css
168 ms
responsive.css
167 ms
jquery.js
214 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
164 ms
buttons.js
37 ms
adsbygoogle.js
37 ms
infolinks_main.js
73 ms
wp-embed.min.js
136 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
7 ms
collect
67 ms
ga-audiences
72 ms
honeycomb.png
299 ms
cropped-REET.png
309 ms
REET-2016-Expected-Cut-Off-Marks-District-Wise-Merit-List-150x150.png
302 ms
Rajasthan-REET-Result-2015-2016-Expected-Date-150x150.png
308 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsFzqCfRpIA3W6ypxnPISCPA.woff
32 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nCSLrGe-fkSRw2DeVgOoWcQ.woff
33 ms
WyXtbLelkv62W9rJf1sl7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7RK3pFr+gVvaJX9Ipe0St6tV6tV+vVerVerVfr1Xq1Xq3X6DV6jV7T9Yr3qXifivepdPIfY1AvlQABUnNepwAA
30 ms
wZLYhRRxZWGToTRP78bqJQ.woff
30 ms
UnXpojilM3XslYxUnWuVe_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
31 ms
ca-pub-7529781388028466.js
271 ms
zrt_lookup.html
312 ms
show_ads_impl.js
259 ms
user_sync.html
301 ms
usersyncup-an.html
271 ms
ice.js
381 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
141 ms
ads
378 ms
osd.js
6 ms
showad.js
47 ms
PugMaster
16 ms
getSegment.php
158 ms
checkOAuth.esi
88 ms
pixel
17 ms
Pug
68 ms
usersync.aspx
65 ms
Pug
64 ms
pixel
60 ms
Pug
61 ms
Pug
27 ms
Pug
27 ms
Pug
24 ms
Pug
19 ms
Pug
20 ms
t.dhj
64 ms
t.dhj
41 ms
cm
33 ms
x35248
170 ms
13693938243021177656
75 ms
abg.js
77 ms
m_js_controller.js
95 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
50 ms
s-3271.xgi
18 ms
hbpix
40 ms
28 ms
pixel
19 ms
xrefid.xgi
9 ms
19 ms
2981
40 ms
x_button_blue2.png
12 ms
s
54 ms
reet-result.in SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reet-result.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Reet-result.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reet-result.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reet Result. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: