Tools & Wizards About Us
relativa.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

relativa.net

Relativa.net - web dizajn, AdWords, E-mail marketing, web hosting

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

415 ms

Resources Loaded

917 ms

Page Rendered

67 ms

relativa.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to relativa.net homepage info - get ready to check Relativa best content for Croatia right away, or after learning these important things about relativa.net

Relativa.net - web dizajn, AdWords, E-mail marketing, web hosting.

Visit relativa.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Relativa.net page load time and found that the first response time was 415 ms and then it took 984 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

relativa.net performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

relativa.net

415 ms

all.js

209 ms

css

57 ms

css

74 ms

styles.css

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Relativa.net, 15% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 15% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.startbootstrap.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (415 ms) belongs to the original domain Relativa.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

467.0 kB

After Optimization

448.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Relativa.net main page is 467.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 442.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 442.7 kB
  • After minification 442.7 kB
  • After compression 442.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Relativa. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

relativa.net

relativa.net

415 ms

all.js

all.js

209 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

74 ms

styles.css

styles.css

135 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

64 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

258 ms

sb-forms-latest.js

sb-forms-latest.js

64 ms

sb-forms-0.4.1.js

sb-forms-0.4.1.js

20 ms

ipad.png

ipad.png

136 ms

bg-masthead.jpg

bg-masthead.jpg

149 ms

demo-image-01.jpg

demo-image-01.jpg

257 ms

demo-image-02.jpg

demo-image-02.jpg

258 ms

Accessibility Review

relativa.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

relativa.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

relativa.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    HR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Relativa.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Croatian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Relativa.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

relativa.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Relativa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: