6.9 sec in total
2 sec
4.3 sec
567 ms
Visit releaf.in now to see the best up-to-date Re Leaf content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about releaf.in
Trust our reliable sanitation service for clean and hygienic spaces. From residential to commercial needs, we ensure thorough cleanliness. Contact us today!
Visit releaf.inWe analyzed Releaf.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
releaf.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value10.8 s
7/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
2011 ms
17 ms
37 ms
112 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Releaf.in, 7% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Releaf.in.
Page size can be reduced by 261.3 kB (22%)
1.2 MB
909.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Releaf.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 440.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Leaf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.3 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Releaf.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)
44
22
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Leaf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
releaf.in
2011 ms
js_composer.min.css
17 ms
e5e42ba05f9c0e7e3dcb0a446c6d9618.css
37 ms
2ab7c2973fe50d8614cc4c5ac4aac923.css
112 ms
5214ded8d0da3935b2af1133b8053a6d.css
86 ms
ticons.min.css
32 ms
f88cb7c6f20b07adf79cd172370581d1.css
47 ms
fd08bcc1dfa2dae408e4c47abce53e6b.css
49 ms
6ddd8cead1ed5e3f225de0a88630313b.js
53 ms
f6a83d729117dc677fc5450ce43b5f7b.js
49 ms
js
80 ms
email-decode.min.js
45 ms
omgf-stylesheet-78.css
49 ms
ba5ab4f9376768c7a5db1b1a35ef7d91.css
54 ms
buttons.min.css
51 ms
1a431ccf1a7e56850e021e02b474a577.css
60 ms
56cb8deb44934731ed2e9160cb1b7613.js
76 ms
300d31b291f3b408bc37b706dd43b4eb.js
391 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
387 ms
7f6c416e51d85396df9feb36ccf78903.js
81 ms
lazyload.min.js
87 ms
gtm.js
265 ms
gtm.js
350 ms
Re-leaf.png
230 ms
dummy.png
230 ms
sigh2.png
343 ms
ytbg2.png
412 ms
Portable-Toilet-1.png
412 ms
bio-tanks-2.png
413 ms
efs-1.png
230 ms
Containerized-Infrastructure-Solution-1.png
231 ms
bio-tiolets.png
232 ms
bg-section4.png
232 ms
download.jpg
233 ms
toilet-rent.jpg
234 ms
Ayodya.webp
235 ms
environmentaldegradation.jpg
236 ms
Releaf-3.webp
341 ms
releafinnjpg-1.jpg
341 ms
releafin.jpg
412 ms
Releaflight.png
412 ms
preloader.png
410 ms
ticons.woff
446 ms
admin-ajax.php
1531 ms
wpex-google-font-open-sans.css
12 ms
2b0ce1a13d93542c0f969ee095dac340.css
17 ms
releaf.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
releaf.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
releaf.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Releaf.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Releaf.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
releaf.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Re Leaf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: