4.1 sec in total
490 ms
2.6 sec
1 sec
Visit remote.online now to see the best up-to-date Remote content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about remote.online
Remote is a digital product studio specialising in online applications for business automation, business process management, and business transformation.
Visit remote.onlineWe analyzed Remote.online page load time and found that the first response time was 490 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
remote.online performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value21.5 s
0/100
25%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
Value45,080 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value70.0 s
0/100
10%
490 ms
574 ms
422 ms
35 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Remote.online, 13% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Remote.online.
Page size can be reduced by 264.6 kB (8%)
3.4 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Remote.online main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 231.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remote images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 113 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remote.online needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (38%)
34
21
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
remote.online
490 ms
styles-min.css
574 ms
scripts-vendor-min.js
422 ms
lazysizes.min.js
35 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
45 ms
animation.gsap.js
52 ms
api.js
97 ms
scripts-min.js
430 ms
back.svg
459 ms
vaulta-mobile.png
863 ms
icon-arrow-right-blue.svg
419 ms
playrcart.png
1864 ms
ten80.png
1243 ms
automate-icon.svg
862 ms
icon-arrow.svg
859 ms
leverage-icon.svg
905 ms
disrupt-icon.svg
1244 ms
right-remote-graphic.png
1683 ms
remote-volvo-graphic-1.png
1947 ms
remote-logo-white.svg
906 ms
b1g1.svg
1430 ms
gtm.js
196 ms
invisible.js
578 ms
Intelligent%20Design%20-%20AvertaStdPE-Regular.otf
1149 ms
Intelligent%20Design%20-%20AvertaStdPE-Semibold.otf
1182 ms
recaptcha__en.js
84 ms
anchor
80 ms
js
136 ms
analytics.js
128 ms
styles__ltr.css
16 ms
recaptcha__en.js
40 ms
webworker.js
74 ms
logo_48.png
52 ms
collect
113 ms
recaptcha__en.js
37 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
186 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
200 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
205 ms
collect
189 ms
755c65c1effb6fb9
45 ms
remote.online accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
remote.online best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
remote.online SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remote.online can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remote.online main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remote.online
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Remote. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: