Tools & Wizards About Us
remote.team screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

remote.team

Remote.Team: Internal chat. Manage hundreds of tasks every day

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

209 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

466 ms

remote.team screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Remote content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about remote.team

A tool with an integrated task management system: privacy setting, project management using tags, guest access, 24/7 support, Live Support for your website

Visit remote.team

Key Findings

We analyzed Remote.team page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remote.team performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

remote.team

209 ms

remote.team

471 ms

329 ms

js

127 ms

app.ce99018f.js

156 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Remote.team, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Remote.team.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.6 kB (73%)

Content Size

177.2 kB

After Optimization

48.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Remote.team main page is 177.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 156.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 128.6 kB

  • Original 156.2 kB
  • After minification 141.5 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

remote.team

remote.team

209 ms

remote.team

remote.team

471 ms

329 ms

js

js

127 ms

app.ce99018f.js

app.ce99018f.js

156 ms

laptop_main_en.svg

laptop_main_en.svg

764 ms

laptop_notif_en.svg

laptop_notif_en.svg

952 ms

stars-4.5.svg

stars-4.5.svg

314 ms

trustpilot.webp

trustpilot.webp

313 ms

arrow-circle-left.svg

arrow-circle-left.svg

318 ms

stars-5.svg

stars-5.svg

316 ms

stars-1.svg

stars-1.svg

405 ms

arrow-circle-right.svg

arrow-circle-right.svg

403 ms

live-chat_en.webp

live-chat_en.webp

499 ms

img1.68312ebb.webp

img1.68312ebb.webp

500 ms

img2.1c211df1.webp

img2.1c211df1.webp

499 ms

img3.c9fbb782.webp

img3.c9fbb782.webp

675 ms

img4.38f7972f.webp

img4.38f7972f.webp

585 ms

img5.4b03f3b1.webp

img5.4b03f3b1.webp

586 ms

si_linkedin.webp

si_linkedin.webp

586 ms

si_twitter.webp

si_twitter.webp

678 ms

si_reddit.webp

si_reddit.webp

677 ms

si_instagram.webp

si_instagram.webp

676 ms

latoregular.1fbf86c9.woff

latoregular.1fbf86c9.woff

901 ms

latobold.7ff99161.woff

latobold.7ff99161.woff

900 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

28 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

Accessibility Review

remote.team accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

remote.team best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

remote.team SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remote.team can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remote.team main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

remote.team

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Remote. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: