Tools & Wizards About Us
repairprocedures.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

repairprocedures.com

RepairProcedures.com - Providing electronic service information for 1995 to current GM vehicles

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

138 ms

repairprocedures.com screenshot

About Website

Visit repairprocedures.com now to see the best up-to-date Repair Procedures content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about repairprocedures.com

Service manuals, electrical schematics and bulletins for 1995 to current GM vehicles.

Visit repairprocedures.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Repairprocedures.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

repairprocedures.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

repairprocedures.com

117 ms

www.repairprocedures.com

819 ms

css

36 ms

bootstrap.min.css

46 ms

font-awesome.min.css

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Repairprocedures.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (819 ms) belongs to the original domain Repairprocedures.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 207.8 kB (45%)

Content Size

466.4 kB

After Optimization

258.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Repairprocedures.com main page is 466.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 202.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 73.8 kB

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 49.3 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.6 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 72.2 kB
  • After minification 72.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Repair Procedures images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 68.8 kB

  • Original 202.0 kB
  • After minification 202.0 kB
  • After compression 133.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 65.2 kB

  • Original 108.4 kB
  • After minification 67.1 kB
  • After compression 43.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Repairprocedures.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (83%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Repair Procedures. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

repairprocedures.com

repairprocedures.com

117 ms

www.repairprocedures.com

www.repairprocedures.com

819 ms

css

css

36 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

46 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

81 ms

all.css

all.css

115 ms

perfect-scrollbar.css

perfect-scrollbar.css

112 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

117 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

125 ms

xmlparser.css

xmlparser.css

139 ms

styles.css

styles.css

196 ms

styles-responsive.css

styles-responsive.css

149 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

155 ms

theme-default.css

theme-default.css

147 ms

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

188 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js

169 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

176 ms

jquery.blockUI.js

jquery.blockUI.js

183 ms

jquery.icheck.min.js

jquery.icheck.min.js

189 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

200 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

203 ms

perfect-scrollbar.js

perfect-scrollbar.js

217 ms

bootbox.min.js

bootbox.min.js

219 ms

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

225 ms

jquery-scrolltofixed-min.js

jquery-scrolltofixed-min.js

228 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

225 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

230 ms

jquery.velocity.min.js

jquery.velocity.min.js

253 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

251 ms

holder.js

holder.js

252 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

262 ms

main_min.js

main_min.js

266 ms

pti_min.js

pti_min.js

261 ms

_all.css

_all.css

173 ms

_all.css

_all.css

183 ms

_all.css

_all.css

171 ms

_all.css

_all.css

184 ms

polaris.css

polaris.css

188 ms

futurico.css

futurico.css

194 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

164 ms

logo.png

logo.png

175 ms

light_dots.png

light_dots.png

136 ms

engine_background.jpg

engine_background.jpg

175 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

47 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

67 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

77 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

78 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

79 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

77 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

78 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

76 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

76 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

63 ms

js

js

91 ms

print.css

print.css

35 ms

Accessibility Review

repairprocedures.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

repairprocedures.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

repairprocedures.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Repairprocedures.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Repairprocedures.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

repairprocedures.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Repair Procedures. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: