Tools & Wizards About Us
repetitor.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

repetitor.ru

Репетиторы в Москве - Репетитор.ру

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

532 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

446 ms

repetitor.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to repetitor.ru homepage info - get ready to check Repetitor best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about repetitor.ru

Большая база репетиторов, бесплатный подбор и разнообразие предметов в Москве. Благодаря специальным алгоритмам подберем подходящего репетитора.

Visit repetitor.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Repetitor.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 532 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

repetitor.ru performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value890 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

repetitor.ru

532 ms

style.css

127 ms

js.js

254 ms

cktrm.js

282 ms

lt0.gif

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Repetitor.ru, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (975 ms) belongs to the original domain Repetitor.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.5 kB (16%)

Content Size

345.4 kB

After Optimization

289.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Repetitor.ru main page is 345.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 262.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

  • Original 54.5 kB
  • After minification 53.9 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 262.6 kB
  • After minification 251.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Repetitor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 794 B

  • Original 22.5 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Repetitor.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (30%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Repetitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

repetitor.ru

repetitor.ru

532 ms

style.css

style.css

127 ms

js.js

js.js

254 ms

cktrm.js

cktrm.js

282 ms

lt0.gif

lt0.gif

128 ms

ct0.gif

ct0.gif

130 ms

lt2.gif

lt2.gif

135 ms

rt2.gif

rt2.gif

253 ms

rt0.gif

rt0.gif

255 ms

lm0.gif

lm0.gif

259 ms

lt1.gif

lt1.gif

260 ms

logo1.gif

logo1.gif

268 ms

x_20101216195638_4bf3292.jpg

x_20101216195638_4bf3292.jpg

267 ms

2mail.gif

2mail.gif

376 ms

sh2.gif

sh2.gif

380 ms

x_20110330153836_49e35bf.jpg

x_20110330153836_49e35bf.jpg

385 ms

x_20110415142140_2d4ebf7.jpg

x_20110415142140_2d4ebf7.jpg

515 ms

x_20110208014142_5869a68.jpg

x_20110208014142_5869a68.jpg

531 ms

x_20111028235752_3b38102.jpg

x_20111028235752_3b38102.jpg

399 ms

x_20101219160714_841abbb.gif

x_20101219160714_841abbb.gif

501 ms

x_20110912141220_92377bc.jpg

x_20110912141220_92377bc.jpg

506 ms

x_20110517095248_e760617.jpg

x_20110517095248_e760617.jpg

646 ms

x_20110926005236_f4da5aa.jpg

x_20110926005236_f4da5aa.jpg

535 ms

20141012223412_40fb5e0.jpg

20141012223412_40fb5e0.jpg

625 ms

x_20101219165548_e1b289e.jpg

x_20101219165548_e1b289e.jpg

634 ms

x_20101219165621_81acd91.jpg

x_20101219165621_81acd91.jpg

641 ms

x_20101219164544_00c419e.jpg

x_20101219164544_00c419e.jpg

662 ms

x_20110118182906_bd9b053.jpg

x_20110118182906_bd9b053.jpg

799 ms

x_20110412174610_a0d5c1a.jpg

x_20110412174610_a0d5c1a.jpg

750 ms

x_20101219221857_bf438bc.jpg

x_20101219221857_bf438bc.jpg

760 ms

x_20101225022203_3c7c380.jpg

x_20101225022203_3c7c380.jpg

772 ms

x_20110116231530_6648795.jpg

x_20110116231530_6648795.jpg

775 ms

x_20101219165512_eaf2279.jpg

x_20101219165512_eaf2279.jpg

796 ms

x_20101219165449_326a8f6.jpg

x_20101219165449_326a8f6.jpg

876 ms

rt1.gif

rt1.gif

887 ms

lb1.gif

lb1.gif

902 ms

rb1.gif

rb1.gif

905 ms

lb2.gif

lb2.gif

930 ms

rb2.gif

rb2.gif

923 ms

hit

hit

256 ms

rm0.gif

rm0.gif

975 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

5 ms

collect

collect

10 ms

lb0.gif

lb0.gif

899 ms

cb0.gif

cb0.gif

913 ms

rb0.gif

rb0.gif

913 ms

Accessibility Review

repetitor.ru accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

repetitor.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

repetitor.ru SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Repetitor.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Repetitor.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

repetitor.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Repetitor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: