Tools & Wizards About Us
reply.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    35% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 73% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

reply.io

Reply.io | AI Sales Engagement + Free B2B Data + Sales Automation

Page Load Speed

9.1 sec in total

First Response

320 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

4.2 sec

reply.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reply.io homepage info - get ready to check Reply best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about reply.io

Reply.io is the AI-first sales engagement platform that helps SDR teams find new prospects, engage them through multiple channels, and create new opportunities at scale while keeping every touchpoint ...

Visit reply.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Reply.io page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reply.io performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value39.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value44,210 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.263

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value56.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reply.io

320 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

253 ms

reset.css

247 ms

font-awesome-custom.css

964 ms

style.css

974 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Reply.io, 3% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 1% (1 request) were made to P.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Reply.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 189.3 kB (75%)

Content Size

251.0 kB

After Optimization

61.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reply.io main page is 251.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 239.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 189.3 kB

  • Original 239.4 kB
  • After minification 239.3 kB
  • After compression 50.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 11.6 kB
  • After minification 11.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reply images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (62%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reply. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reply.io

reply.io

320 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

253 ms

reset.css

reset.css

247 ms

font-awesome-custom.css

font-awesome-custom.css

964 ms

style.css

style.css

974 ms

header.css

header.css

969 ms

footer.css

footer.css

710 ms

mobileNav.css

mobileNav.css

976 ms

mqk0ajo.css

mqk0ajo.css

978 ms

home-2022.css

home-2022.css

1476 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

1974 ms

js.cookie-3.0.1.min.js

js.cookie-3.0.1.min.js

2079 ms

lite-url.min.js

lite-url.min.js

1974 ms

traffic-source.min.js

traffic-source.min.js

2076 ms

common-exec.js

common-exec.js

2077 ms

svgs-inline-min.js

svgs-inline-min.js

2075 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

2193 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

2073 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2217 ms

new-tab.js

new-tab.js

2227 ms

header.js

header.js

2224 ms

functions.js

functions.js

2255 ms

mobileNav.js

mobileNav.js

2216 ms

home-2022.js

home-2022.js

2471 ms

alpinejs.js

alpinejs.js

2511 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2252 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

2253 ms

p.css

p.css

87 ms

Calibre-Medium.woff

Calibre-Medium.woff

311 ms

Calibre-Regular.woff

Calibre-Regular.woff

348 ms

Calibre-SemiBold.woff

Calibre-SemiBold.woff

208 ms

3reply.woff

3reply.woff

453 ms

d

d

146 ms

d

d

207 ms

font-awesome-custom.woff

font-awesome-custom.woff

665 ms

main.visual.png

main.visual.png

683 ms

Adobe_Corporate_logo-1-1.png

Adobe_Corporate_logo-1-1.png

248 ms

Strava_Logo-1-1.png

Strava_Logo-1-1.png

302 ms

forwarderlogo_134_OneTrust-1.png

forwarderlogo_134_OneTrust-1.png

777 ms

logo-1-1.png

logo-1-1.png

673 ms

Vector.png

Vector.png

766 ms

Group-1.png

Group-1.png

780 ms

tribe-1.png

tribe-1.png

787 ms

evercam-1.png

evercam-1.png

892 ms

Frame.png

Frame.png

758 ms

Airbridge_logo_CL-copy-1.png

Airbridge_logo_CL-copy-1.png

979 ms

discover.svg

discover.svg

973 ms

engage.svg

engage.svg

993 ms

execute.svg

execute.svg

1012 ms

improve.svg

improve.svg

1002 ms

thumb_square_c3258fe8e884c07a4c1487c124cf8d86.jpg

thumb_square_c3258fe8e884c07a4c1487c124cf8d86.jpg

1125 ms

scott-mulligan.png

scott-mulligan.png

1195 ms

unnamed-1.jpeg

unnamed-1.jpeg

1227 ms

Benjamin-Sudol.jpg

Benjamin-Sudol.jpg

1090 ms

thumb_square_fabbf5709213a694c687c61927ab66ee.jpg

thumb_square_fabbf5709213a694c687c61927ab66ee.jpg

1241 ms

thumb_square_3b66c05ca221e4cb1fae1b6bee9b4860.jpg

thumb_square_3b66c05ca221e4cb1fae1b6bee9b4860.jpg

1251 ms

1559568854997.jpeg

1559568854997.jpeg

1350 ms

thumb_square_5256dfe706fea1f4249dfaf9254adc37.jpg

thumb_square_5256dfe706fea1f4249dfaf9254adc37.jpg

1368 ms

Aleksandra.png

Aleksandra.png

1430 ms

thumb_square_e367a902006095988e8be389ce208d6e.jpg

thumb_square_e367a902006095988e8be389ce208d6e.jpg

1490 ms

Cain-Castor.jpg

Cain-Castor.jpg

1480 ms

Besstrochnyi.jpg

Besstrochnyi.jpg

1490 ms

thumb_square_473a65a6596b2df27f6b96c5c748f39a.jpg

thumb_square_473a65a6596b2df27f6b96c5c748f39a.jpg

1584 ms

thumb_square_1550267009.jpg

thumb_square_1550267009.jpg

1587 ms

1647600083407.jpg

1647600083407.jpg

1476 ms

Group-168.png

Group-168.png

1578 ms

Group-138.png

Group-138.png

1356 ms

Group-1382.png

Group-1382.png

1542 ms

Group-1391.png

Group-1391.png

1542 ms

oleg-1.png

oleg-1.png

1522 ms

_.txt

_.txt

1273 ms

Accessibility Review

reply.io accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

reply.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reply.io SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reply.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reply.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reply.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reply. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: