4.5 sec in total
885 ms
3.4 sec
181 ms
Click here to check amazing RE Print content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reprint.com
RE:Print Copy & Printing, Toronto, digital printing, copying, printing, offset printing, binding, graphic design, direct mail, creative services, newsletters, training, distribution, communications, e...
Visit reprint.comWe analyzed Reprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 885 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
reprint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value25.0 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.149
76/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
885 ms
19 ms
41 ms
50 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Reprint.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to 036683f.netsolhost.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (885 ms) belongs to the original domain Reprint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 399.8 kB (44%)
910.5 kB
510.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Reprint.com main page is 910.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 411.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RE Print images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 195.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reprint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (59%)
70
29
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RE Print. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.reprint.com
885 ms
ga.js
19 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
41 ms
ppss_style.css
50 ms
style.css
77 ms
layout.css
47 ms
blue.css
67 ms
responsive.css
56 ms
formalize.css
62 ms
superfish.css
65 ms
prettyPhoto.css
85 ms
nonverblaster.css
73 ms
flexslider.css
83 ms
settings.css
148 ms
captions.css
150 ms
style.php
121 ms
jquery.js
148 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
119 ms
swfobject.js
115 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
172 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
177 ms
widgets.js
28 ms
plusone.js
40 ms
in.js
28 ms
superfish.js
167 ms
jquery.jcarousellite.js
170 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
172 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
170 ms
jquery.formalize.min.js
270 ms
nonverblaster.js
271 ms
app.js
272 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
273 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
272 ms
comment-reply.min.js
273 ms
mtli-str-replace.min.js
276 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
reprint_logo.png
161 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
119 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
147 ms
to-top.png
92 ms
linkedin.png
125 ms
google_plus.png
123 ms
skype.png
123 ms
www.reprint.com
90 ms
transparent.png
91 ms
divider1.png
125 ms
cabbagetown-youth-88-lighten-460x260.jpg
123 ms
circle-hover.png
123 ms
agent-pv_ad-460x260.jpg
156 ms
cfr-cover-page-460x260.jpg
147 ms
footer-contact-adress.png
148 ms
footer-contact-phone.png
150 ms
footer-contact-fax.png
149 ms
footer-contact-email.png
150 ms
footer-contact-internet.png
154 ms
gettingyou.png
118 ms
slider3.png
164 ms
communicating-your-message1.png
142 ms
vector.png
152 ms
report.png
150 ms
brochure.png
149 ms
websiteCYC.png
158 ms
print.png
153 ms
marketing.png
196 ms
creative.png
197 ms
reprint_white.png
196 ms
timer.png
120 ms
loader.gif
119 ms
bullet.png
27 ms
large_left.png
28 ms
large_right.png
28 ms
reprint.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reprint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reprint.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reprint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RE Print. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: