Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

reproductive-health-journal.com

Home page | Reproductive Health

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

362 ms

reproductive-health-journal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reproductive-health-journal.com homepage info - get ready to check Reproductive Health Journal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about reproductive-health-journal.com

Aware of the global challenges surrounding access to adequate reproductive healthcare, Reproductive Health is an internationally celebrated, open access ...

Visit reproductive-health-journal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reproductive-health-journal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reproductive-health-journal.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.reproductive-health-journal.com

136 ms

reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com

302 ms

css

71 ms

suis-biomedcentral.86d30a9e.css

35 ms

webtrekk_v4.min.js

309 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reproductive-health-journal.com, 28% (20 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 18% (13 requests) were made to Reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) relates to the external source Resource-cms.springer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 731.1 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

874.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Reproductive-health-journal.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 928.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 43.7 kB

  • Original 55.8 kB
  • After minification 47.8 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 620.6 kB
  • After minification 589.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reproductive Health Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 656.0 kB

  • Original 928.9 kB
  • After minification 928.9 kB
  • After compression 272.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 656.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (43%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reproductive Health Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

reproductive-health-journal.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reproductive-health-journal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reproductive-health-journal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reproductive Health Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: