Tools & Wizards About Us
reputation-control.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

reputation-control.com

Reputation-Control.com - 100% Reputation Control for Individuals and Companies

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

305 ms

reputation-control.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reputation-control.com homepage info - get ready to check Reputation Control best content right away, or after learning these important things about reputation-control.com

Guaranteed Results, 24/7 Availability, Thousands of Successful Case Studies in USA, Canada, Europe, South America, and Australia. Leader in Reputation Management and Removal of Negative Reviews and Po...

Visit reputation-control.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reputation-control.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reputation-control.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.293

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reputation-control.com

134 ms

reputation-control.com

325 ms

app.css

62 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

125 ms

jquery.min.js

271 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Reputation-control.com, 58% (38 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (368 ms) belongs to the original domain Reputation-control.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 221.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reputation-control.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 944.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 163.1 kB

  • Original 194.1 kB
  • After minification 191.7 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 944.6 kB
  • After minification 907.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reputation Control images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 135.8 kB
  • After minification 135.8 kB
  • After compression 119.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reputation-control.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (35%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reputation Control. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reputation-control.com

reputation-control.com

134 ms

reputation-control.com

reputation-control.com

325 ms

app.css

app.css

62 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

125 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

271 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

190 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

368 ms

common.js

common.js

188 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

88 ms

fs.js

fs.js

23 ms

counter.js

counter.js

43 ms

t.php

t.php

93 ms

logo-s.png

logo-s.png

75 ms

pr-logos-2.png

pr-logos-2.png

156 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

154 ms

sm-fb.png

sm-fb.png

154 ms

sm-tw.png

sm-tw.png

153 ms

sm-in.png

sm-in.png

192 ms

sm-yt.png

sm-yt.png

195 ms

sm-gp.png

sm-gp.png

195 ms

et-divi-dynamic-37-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-37-late.css

169 ms

consultation-bg-w.jpg

consultation-bg-w.jpg

222 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

27 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

32 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

42 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

42 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

37 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

57 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

9 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

5 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

5 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

9 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff

9 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

8 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

12 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

16 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

12 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

12 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

134 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff

16 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

16 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff

18 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

19 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff

16 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

22 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff

18 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

19 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff

23 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf

24 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff

24 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf

24 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff

24 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

27 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff

27 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

31 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff

31 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf

31 ms

805191-40.jpg

805191-40.jpg

65 ms

google-seo.png

google-seo.png

124 ms

businessman-suggestion.png

businessman-suggestion.png

305 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

64 ms

Accessibility Review

reputation-control.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reputation-control.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

reputation-control.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reputation-control.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reputation-control.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reputation-control.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reputation Control. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: