46.2 sec in total
691 ms
7.7 sec
37.8 sec
Visit res.com.mo now to see the best up-to-date Res content for Macao and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about res.com.mo
來來電器,我地信賴嘅電器顧問
Visit res.com.moWe analyzed Res.com.mo page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 45.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
res.com.mo performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
691 ms
677 ms
1884 ms
48 ms
519 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Res.com.mo, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to C.ancientec.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Res.com.mo.
Page size can be reduced by 4.2 MB (14%)
29.7 MB
25.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Res.com.mo main page is 29.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 28.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Res needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.2 MB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 647 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Res.com.mo has all CSS files already compressed.
We found no issues to fix!
91
91
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Res. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
res.com.mo
691 ms
main.min.css
677 ms
main.min.js
1884 ms
css
48 ms
countly.min.js
519 ms
449075691_874423974709633_2945071837396374201_n.jpg
1431 ms
451657427_888559183296112_4923083125619007588_n.jpg
1209 ms
452055884_888989833253047_4910464221910466639_n.jpg
1879 ms
451446199_886654796819884_4620815756532335213_n.jpg
2733 ms
img_logo_white.png
241 ms
193_web.jpg
241 ms
192_web.jpg
1344 ms
195_web.png
1347 ms
194_web.jpg
2288 ms
179_web.jpg
1633 ms
1267.jpg
710 ms
1268.jpg
2163 ms
1269.jpg
1184 ms
1270.jpg
1449 ms
1271.jpg
2019 ms
1272.jpg
1592 ms
1273.jpg
1701 ms
1274.jpg
2276 ms
1275.jpg
2303 ms
1276.jpg
1965 ms
1277.jpg
2202 ms
1278.jpg
2254 ms
Thumb.php
2394 ms
Thumb.php
2437 ms
16312.png
2486 ms
17825.png
2499 ms
10980.png
2515 ms
17261.jpg
2526 ms
19241.png
2626 ms
5623.jpg
2670 ms
17792.png
2729 ms
15461.png
2739 ms
16001.png
2747 ms
16502.png
2758 ms
18047.png
2870 ms
15308.jpg
2904 ms
17793.png
2970 ms
15089.jpeg
2974 ms
15800.png
2982 ms
19322.png
2951 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
134 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
145 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
145 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
145 ms
12846.jpg
2868 ms
15059.png
2911 ms
countly.min.js
1313 ms
15107.png
2501 ms
15151.jpg
2037 ms
18065.jpg
1880 ms
17664.jpeg
1886 ms
10559.jpg
1891 ms
14385.jpg
1796 ms
17732.png
1803 ms
192.jpg
1745 ms
i
262 ms
18964.png
1738 ms
15952.jpg
1456 ms
15214.jpg
1437 ms
14988.jpg
1423 ms
15544.png
1865 ms
19325.png
1423 ms
19356.jpg
1425 ms
16925.png
1534 ms
15139.jpeg
1466 ms
18090.jpg
1487 ms
4055.jpg
1444 ms
12847.jpg
1441 ms
18046.png
1567 ms
14184.jpg
1569 ms
14429.jpg
1529 ms
16335.jpg
1496 ms
19324.png
1444 ms
17459.png
1582 ms
15131.jpg
1582 ms
13554.png
1586 ms
16470.png
1532 ms
16975.jpeg
1515 ms
16699.png
1457 ms
17663.jpeg
1589 ms
15069.png
1594 ms
19222.png
1589 ms
14690.jpg
2007 ms
12419.png
1526 ms
footer_icon_1.png
1468 ms
footer_icon_2.png
1583 ms
footer_icon_3.png
1577 ms
footer_icon_4.png
1581 ms
footer_icon_5.png
1560 ms
footer-appstore.png
1518 ms
footer-facebook.png
1589 ms
footer-playstore.png
1591 ms
footer-wechat.png
1572 ms
res.com.mo accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
res.com.mo best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
res.com.mo SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
ZH
![]()
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Res.com.mo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Res.com.mo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
res.com.mo
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Res. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: