8.7 sec in total
2.2 sec
6.1 sec
369 ms
Visit researcheasy.com now to see the best up-to-date Researcheasy content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about researcheasy.com
Reviewing a product requires one to have indepth knowledge of the product coupled with vast amount of tehnical expertise without being subjective. No bias reviews.
Visit researcheasy.comWe analyzed Researcheasy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
researcheasy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value1,460 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
2242 ms
32 ms
628 ms
831 ms
1129 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Researcheasy.com, 25% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Researcheasy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 600.3 kB (49%)
1.2 MB
614.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Researcheasy.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 623.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Researcheasy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 323.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 323.7 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Researcheasy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (74%)
47
12
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Researcheasy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
researcheasy.com
2242 ms
css
32 ms
all.min.css
628 ms
font-icons.min.css
831 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1129 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1702 ms
swiper.min.css
1265 ms
post-1206.css
1126 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1128 ms
post-7.css
1126 ms
css
17 ms
ResearchEasy.com-Logo.png
1802 ms
widget-posts.min.css
1053 ms
explaindio3.png
1268 ms
explaindio-com-2014-11-13-23-43-42.jpeg
1069 ms
ULVq08JFpYE
157 ms
post-431.css
1265 ms
animations.min.css
1266 ms
menu.min.js
1285 ms
back-to-top.min.js
1585 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1585 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1585 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1591 ms
jquery.min.js
1918 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1732 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1939 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1733 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1733 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2155 ms
hooks.min.js
1941 ms
i18n.min.js
1942 ms
frontend.min.js
1942 ms
waypoints.min.js
2136 ms
core.min.js
2136 ms
frontend.min.js
2137 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
2137 ms
guarantee8.png
2137 ms
kdspy-box.png
2353 ms
kdroi-box.png
2364 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
36 ms
base.js
73 ms
ad_status.js
229 ms
nML6sO0rp_owOkRMsF5s0qJry7DmnW_dXxSd8CRnFU8.js
121 ms
embed.js
42 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
60 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
61 ms
Create
152 ms
id
141 ms
GenerateIT
14 ms
u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwg.ttf
9 ms
u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkW-EH7alwg.ttf
78 ms
u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7alwg.ttf
91 ms
u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwg.ttf
93 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
93 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
92 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
89 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
87 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
95 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
94 ms
u-4V0qWljRw-Pd815fNqc8T_wAFcX-c37MPiNYlWniJ2hJXHx_KVxUbq.ttf
94 ms
u-4V0qWljRw-Pd815fNqc8T_wAFcX-c37MPiNYlWniJ2hJXH9fKVxUbq.ttf
129 ms
u-4V0qWljRw-Pd815fNqc8T_wAFcX-c37MPiNYlWniJ2hJXHGfWVxUbq.ttf
128 ms
u-4V0qWljRw-Pd815fNqc8T_wAFcX-c37MPiNYlWniJ2hJXHIPWVxUbq.ttf
124 ms
generatepress.woff
748 ms
researcheasy.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
researcheasy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
researcheasy.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Researcheasy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Researcheasy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
researcheasy.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Researcheasy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: