Tools & Wizards About Us
researchtalk.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    31% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

researchtalk.co.uk

Research Talk - Website For Financial Research And Information

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

814 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

479 ms

researchtalk.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit researchtalk.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Research Talk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about researchtalk.co.uk

Financial research is simply a term that is used to refer to the searching of relevant financial data from the various information platforms available and..

Visit researchtalk.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Researchtalk.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 814 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

researchtalk.co.uk performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,640 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.researchtalk.co.uk

814 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

101 ms

custom-fonts.css

191 ms

style.min.css

196 ms

swipebox.min.css

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Researchtalk.co.uk, 16% (6 requests) were made to Youtube-nocookie.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (814 ms) belongs to the original domain Researchtalk.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 675.7 kB (31%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Researchtalk.co.uk main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 320.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Research Talk needs image optimization as it can save up to 320.9 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 79.4 kB
  • After minification 79.4 kB
  • After compression 53.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 314.3 kB

  • Original 400.0 kB
  • After minification 399.6 kB
  • After compression 85.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Researchtalk.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 314.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (60%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Research Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.researchtalk.co.uk

www.researchtalk.co.uk

814 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

101 ms

custom-fonts.css

custom-fonts.css

191 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

196 ms

swipebox.min.css

swipebox.min.css

199 ms

style.css

style.css

200 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

294 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

304 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

287 ms

jquery.swipebox.min.js

jquery.swipebox.min.js

291 ms

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

298 ms

front.js

front.js

303 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

391 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

383 ms

style.css

style.css

196 ms

kshIWIc15yg

kshIWIc15yg

131 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

503 ms

logo04.png

logo04.png

578 ms

cropped-header-1.png

cropped-header-1.png

578 ms

financial-research-companies.png

financial-research-companies.png

503 ms

financial-research.png

financial-research.png

503 ms

google-300x110.png

google-300x110.png

501 ms

brain-juicer.png

brain-juicer.png

501 ms

infographic.jpg

infographic.jpg

580 ms

raleway-v12-latin-ext_latin-regular.woff

raleway-v12-latin-ext_latin-regular.woff

419 ms

raleway-v12-latin-ext_latin-700.woff

raleway-v12-latin-ext_latin-700.woff

495 ms

bitter-v12-latin-ext_latin-700.woff

bitter-v12-latin-ext_latin-700.woff

492 ms

bitter-v12-latin-ext_latin-regular.woff

bitter-v12-latin-ext_latin-regular.woff

615 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

10 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

39 ms

base.js

base.js

73 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

36 ms

gJfj2lBrymlHLmhPScFZFm4D3a7BBd9OMx4--DsdpK8.js

gJfj2lBrymlHLmhPScFZFm4D3a7BBd9OMx4--DsdpK8.js

87 ms

embed.js

embed.js

37 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

165 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

166 ms

Create

Create

155 ms

Accessibility Review

researchtalk.co.uk accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

researchtalk.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

researchtalk.co.uk SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Researchtalk.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Researchtalk.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

researchtalk.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Research Talk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: