3.9 sec in total
947 ms
2.6 sec
344 ms
Welcome to resultfor.in homepage info - get ready to check Resultfor best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about resultfor.in
Board, University Result & all updates
Visit resultfor.inWe analyzed Resultfor.in page load time and found that the first response time was 947 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
resultfor.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.394
26/100
15%
Value2.8 s
97/100
10%
947 ms
235 ms
20 ms
439 ms
445 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Resultfor.in, 16% (11 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 15% (10 requests) were made to Graph.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (947 ms) belongs to the original domain Resultfor.in.
Page size can be reduced by 329.9 kB (69%)
480.3 kB
150.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Resultfor.in main page is 480.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 221.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 565 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resultfor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 139.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultfor.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (70%)
61
18
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resultfor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
resultfor.in
947 ms
style.css
235 ms
css
20 ms
custom.css
439 ms
font-awesome.min.css
445 ms
social-logos.min.css
663 ms
jetpack.css
461 ms
jquery.js
698 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
465 ms
respond.min.js
658 ms
photon.js
663 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
28 ms
gprofiles.js
22 ms
wpgroho.js
685 ms
selectnav.js
686 ms
facebook-embed.js
874 ms
wp-embed.min.js
881 ms
sharing.js
884 ms
e-201736.js
25 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
656 ms
collect
14 ms
165c2db8cb11141ccd8cbc71899532d3
74 ms
twitter.png
233 ms
facebook.png
233 ms
gplus.png
404 ms
linkedin.png
445 ms
rss.png
445 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf
24 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf
25 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
809 ms
wcYJIEUIwMaAAArwwHdAAA=
23 ms
social-logos.eot
399 ms
sdk.js
66 ms
hovercard.css
28 ms
services.css
28 ms
graph.facebook.com
67 ms
g.gif
33 ms
graph.facebook.com
66 ms
graph.facebook.com
66 ms
graph.facebook.com
65 ms
graph.facebook.com
64 ms
graph.facebook.com
64 ms
graph.facebook.com
94 ms
graph.facebook.com
92 ms
graph.facebook.com
93 ms
graph.facebook.com
93 ms
g.gif
16 ms
g.gif
16 ms
g.gif
17 ms
g.gif
17 ms
g.gif
16 ms
g.gif
16 ms
g.gif
16 ms
g.gif
17 ms
g.gif
17 ms
g.gif
20 ms
47 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
13 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
19 ms
page.php
93 ms
WRYTpCDr6V4.css
12 ms
BWRIL9-XbYW.js
19 ms
JrFVMrRpAYB.js
59 ms
T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
65 ms
14522751_1110442735659848_8177957802117952625_n.png
32 ms
wMkwmq5_RAN.png
6 ms
resultfor.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
resultfor.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
resultfor.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultfor.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resultfor.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
resultfor.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Resultfor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: