Tools & Wizards About Us
resurrectionists.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

resurrectionists.com

Congregation of the Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

529 ms

resurrectionists.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Resurrection Ists content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about resurrectionists.com

Congregation of the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. | Features include news, Charism, Mission, History vocations, ministry and resource information and much more!

Visit resurrectionists.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Resurrectionists.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resurrectionists.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.081

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resurrectionists.com

70 ms

resurrectionists.com

1192 ms

rokbox.css

70 ms

slideshow.css

73 ms

cards.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Resurrectionists.com, 51% (35 requests) were made to D1dpkmexxfc0ba.cloudfront.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Resurrectionists.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Resurrectionists.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 62.4 kB

  • Original 72.2 kB
  • After minification 52.3 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.9 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 93.5 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resurrection Ists images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 291.7 kB
  • After minification 291.6 kB
  • After compression 243.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 98.0 kB
  • After minification 98.0 kB
  • After compression 83.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resurrectionists.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (64%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resurrection Ists. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

resurrectionists.com

resurrectionists.com

70 ms

resurrectionists.com

resurrectionists.com

1192 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

70 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

73 ms

cards.css

cards.css

85 ms

separated.css

separated.css

96 ms

nucleus.css

nucleus.css

76 ms

gemini_9.css

gemini_9.css

84 ms

bootstrap-gantry.css

bootstrap-gantry.css

77 ms

joomla.css

joomla.css

94 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

193 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

96 ms

gemini-joomla_9.css

gemini-joomla_9.css

183 ms

custom_9.css

custom_9.css

98 ms

animate.css

animate.css

98 ms

base.css

base.css

71 ms

gemini-style.css

gemini-style.css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

97 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

101 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

101 ms

caption.js

caption.js

100 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

99 ms

core.js

core.js

102 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

106 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

103 ms

mootools-mobile.js

mootools-mobile.js

254 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

107 ms

roksprocket.js

roksprocket.js

253 ms

moofx.js

moofx.js

111 ms

features.js

features.js

113 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

113 ms

roksprocket.request.js

roksprocket.request.js

117 ms

strips.js

strips.js

259 ms

strips-speeds.js

strips-speeds.js

128 ms

jquery.ui.core.min.js

jquery.ui.core.min.js

131 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

134 ms

js

js

114 ms

main.js

main.js

136 ms

solutio.js

solutio.js

152 ms

accordionmenu.init.js

accordionmenu.init.js

256 ms

css

css

77 ms

css

css

35 ms

css

css

32 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

116 ms

logo.png

logo.png

83 ms

rotator1.jpg

rotator1.jpg

122 ms

rotator2.jpg

rotator2.jpg

195 ms

rotator3.jpg

rotator3.jpg

216 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

214 ms

separator.png

separator.png

172 ms

separator-mobile.png

separator-mobile.png

173 ms

vocation.JPG

vocation.JPG

289 ms

vocation1.jpg

vocation1.jpg

282 ms

vocation2.JPG

vocation2.JPG

284 ms

vocation3.jpg

vocation3.jpg

288 ms

vocation4.JPG

vocation4.JPG

309 ms

contact-us.jpg

contact-us.jpg

308 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

312 ms

icon-email.png

icon-email.png

310 ms

icon-vocation.png

icon-vocation.png

313 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

330 ms

font

font

59 ms

font

font

146 ms

font

font

123 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

101 ms

collect

collect

50 ms

collect

collect

73 ms

js

js

67 ms

Accessibility Review

resurrectionists.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

resurrectionists.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

resurrectionists.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resurrectionists.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resurrectionists.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

resurrectionists.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Resurrection Ists. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: