Access retrospect.team. Retrospect | Collaborate | Brainstorm | Kanban

Report Summary

About Website

Click here to check amazing Retrospect content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about retrospect.team

Easily conduct end of sprint and project retrospectives with everyone on your team no matter their location.

Visit retrospect.team

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,680 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.0 s

0/100

10%

retrospect.team

226 ms

css

55 ms

css2

73 ms

9d48f29a01.js

129 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Retrospect.team, 32% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) belongs to the original domain Retrospect.team.

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Retrospect.team main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

Original 34.9 kB
After minification 25.6 kB
After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 155.1 kB

Original 1.8 MB
After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Retrospect images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

Original 63.1 kB
After minification 63.1 kB
After compression 54.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

Original 55.8 kB
After minification 55.8 kB
After compression 37.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retrospect.team needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retrospect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retrospect.team can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retrospect.team main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

retrospect.team

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Retrospect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Retrospect | Collaborate | Brainstorm | Kanban | Retrospect.team

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)