8.6 sec in total
1.3 sec
6.8 sec
520 ms
Visit review-tlt.ru now to see the best up-to-date Review Tlt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about review-tlt.ru
Информационный сайт
Visit review-tlt.ruWe analyzed Review-tlt.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
review-tlt.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.065
97/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
1305 ms
519 ms
411 ms
790 ms
799 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Review-tlt.ru, 9% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Review-tlt.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 286.3 kB (19%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Review-tlt.ru main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Tlt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 104.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (30%)
74
52
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Tlt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
review-tlt.ru
1305 ms
style.css
519 ms
share-buttons-user.css
411 ms
odkl_share.css
790 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
799 ms
jquery.classdata.js
729 ms
jquery.scrolltofixed.min.js
765 ms
flowplayer.js
891 ms
comment-reply.min.js
832 ms
share-buttons.js
874 ms
share.js
249 ms
openapi.js
357 ms
odkl_share.js
791 ms
odkl_init.js
1138 ms
share.js
548 ms
widgets.js
79 ms
button.js
20 ms
show_ads.js
15 ms
review-tlt.ru
1301 ms
review-tlt.ru
1302 ms
odkl_share.js
263 ms
review-tlt.ru
618 ms
reset.css
217 ms
grid.css
354 ms
connect.js
606 ms
new_share_buttons_sprite.gif
1424 ms
tol_05feb-150x83.jpg
404 ms
tol_07feb_2-150x80.jpg
380 ms
tol_06feb-150x102.jpg
388 ms
tol_07feb-150x84.jpg
388 ms
tol_07feb_2-500x268.jpg
682 ms
tol_07feb.jpg
681 ms
tol_06feb_2-500x301.jpg
881 ms
tol_06feb.jpg
992 ms
tol_06feb_2-150x90.jpg
742 ms
tol_05feb_2-150x97.jpg
762 ms
tol_03feb.jpg
1406 ms
tol_31jan_2-500x318.jpg
1167 ms
tol_20jan_2.jpg
1255 ms
tol_20jan.jpg
1354 ms
toliatti_22nov13-500x302.jpg
1367 ms
toliatti_07oct13_2-500x296.jpg
1532 ms
toliatti_04oct13-500x304.jpg
1644 ms
toliatti_18sep13_21-500x309.jpg
1792 ms
toliatti_10sep13.jpg
1859 ms
tol_30jan_2-500x300.jpg
2027 ms
tol_29jan_2.jpg
2166 ms
tol_30jan-150x97.jpg
1891 ms
tol_24jan_2-150x94.jpg
2011 ms
tol_13jan_2-150x97.jpg
2156 ms
toliatti_11dec13.jpg
2413 ms
toliatti_04dec13.jpg
2381 ms
toliatti_29nov13-500x326.jpg
2517 ms
toliatti_23nov13_2.jpg
2654 ms
picture-240.jpg
2519 ms
29jan_iph.jpg
2676 ms
14jan_bir.jpg
2874 ms
tol_14jan_2.jpg
3049 ms
tol_10jan.jpg
3229 ms
logo.png
2871 ms
ca-pub-9135387229555700.js
155 ms
zrt_lookup.html
152 ms
show_ads_impl.js
95 ms
hit
254 ms
ads
300 ms
osd.js
12 ms
ads
305 ms
hit
138 ms
3282737770107903331
46 ms
abg.js
51 ms
m_js_controller.js
68 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
42 ms
17919176656527611235
88 ms
s
45 ms
x_button_blue2.png
49 ms
veBs87dwiCXgZb9CwomBYiW1hyWXgp0ohA3Vj3gnbUg.js
5 ms
activeview
12 ms
activeview
15 ms
review-tlt.ru
826 ms
review-tlt.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
review-tlt.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
review-tlt.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Review-tlt.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Review-tlt.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
review-tlt.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Review Tlt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: