Tools & Wizards About Us
reviewcompare.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

reviewcompare.co.uk

Mobile Phone Reviews - Compare Mobile Phones at ReviewCompare.co.uk

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

739 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

135 ms

reviewcompare.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reviewcompare.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Review Compare best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviewcompare.co.uk

Mobile Phone Reviews - Compare Mobile Phone deals as well as gadgets and other electrical products. In depth Mobile phone reviews and customer opinions.

Visit reviewcompare.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewcompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 739 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewcompare.co.uk performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

reviewcompare.co.uk

739 ms

style.css

204 ms

jquery.js

263 ms

jqueryslidemenu.js

207 ms

comment-reply.js

192 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewcompare.co.uk, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (739 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviewcompare.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.2 kB (58%)

Content Size

205.4 kB

After Optimization

87.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reviewcompare.co.uk main page is 205.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 114.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 14.0 kB
  • After minification 9.3 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 41.3 kB
  • After minification 27.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Review Compare needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 64.5 kB

  • Original 114.9 kB
  • After minification 114.1 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 35.2 kB
  • After minification 26.3 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewcompare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reviewcompare.co.uk

reviewcompare.co.uk

739 ms

style.css

style.css

204 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

263 ms

jqueryslidemenu.js

jqueryslidemenu.js

207 ms

comment-reply.js

comment-reply.js

192 ms

mctagmap.css

mctagmap.css

187 ms

index.php

index.php

518 ms

default.css

default.css

243 ms

counter_xhtml.js

counter_xhtml.js

13 ms

ga.js

ga.js

33 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

88 ms

logo.png

logo.png

152 ms

bgr_menu.png

bgr_menu.png

88 ms

bgr_mainmenu_li.gif

bgr_mainmenu_li.gif

72 ms

button_go.gif

button_go.gif

87 ms

btn_rss.gif

btn_rss.gif

79 ms

bgr_body.png

bgr_body.png

151 ms

bgr_body_top.png

bgr_body_top.png

158 ms

bgr_body_end.png

bgr_body_end.png

167 ms

bgr_footer_sidebar.png

bgr_footer_sidebar.png

156 ms

t.php

t.php

140 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

like.php

like.php

212 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

135 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

150 ms

SEO Factors

reviewcompare.co.uk SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewcompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewcompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reviewcompare.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Review Compare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: