5.5 sec in total
104 ms
4.6 sec
801 ms
Welcome to reviewcritic.org homepage info - get ready to check Review Critic best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviewcritic.org
Discover unbiased, in-depth reports on health supplements to enable you to make an educated consumer choice about which products to choose. | Review Critic
Visit reviewcritic.orgWe analyzed Reviewcritic.org page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
reviewcritic.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
104 ms
117 ms
49 ms
178 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewcritic.org, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewcritic.org.
Page size can be reduced by 673.8 kB (46%)
1.5 MB
796.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewcritic.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 657.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 563.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 563.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Review Critic needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewcritic.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (56%)
86
38
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Critic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewcritic.org
104 ms
www.reviewcritic.org
117 ms
font-awesome.min.css
49 ms
style.css
178 ms
blocks.style.build.css
208 ms
style.min.css
209 ms
styles.css
178 ms
slick.css
180 ms
css
309 ms
sfsi-style.css
181 ms
style.min.css
296 ms
style.css
250 ms
style.css
250 ms
animate.css
291 ms
customstyles.css.php
1460 ms
jquery.min.js
301 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
302 ms
tie.js
301 ms
prefixfree.min.js
304 ms
modernizr.min.js
293 ms
DMCABadgeHelper.min.js
202 ms
scripts.js
294 ms
slick.min.js
298 ms
core.min.js
298 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
294 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
296 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
295 ms
custom.js
299 ms
script.min.js
298 ms
bootstrap.min.js
306 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
302 ms
equalize.min.js
302 ms
main.min.js
301 ms
wp-embed.min.js
302 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
164 ms
font-awesome.css
88 ms
css
61 ms
css
67 ms
logomiddle.jpg
316 ms
dmca-badge-w150-5x1-06.png
180 ms
reviewcriticlogo.png
185 ms
GoodSense-Migraine-Formula-Review.jpg
186 ms
Kate-Ryan-Skincare-Vitamin-C-Night-Repair-Serum-Review.jpg
184 ms
Cerebral-Success-SmartX-Review.jpg
186 ms
Nature%E2%80%99s-Wellness-Digestive-Enzymes.jpg
184 ms
Mederma-Advanced-Scar-Gel-Review.png
198 ms
Raspberry-Ketone-Premium-Review.jpg
197 ms
MRI-No2-Red-Extreme-Review.jpg
261 ms
Eva-Naturals-Skin-Lightening-Cream-Review.jpg
262 ms
Puritan%E2%80%99s-Pride-Raspberry-Ketones-Review.jpg
261 ms
Story-Skin-Care-Day-Serum-Review.jpg
308 ms
BestVite-Coleus-Forskohlii-Review.jpg
282 ms
Research-Verified-Keto.png
1165 ms
Omega-III-Maxx-Review.jpg
310 ms
Turmeric-Pure-Review-150x150.png
308 ms
OPI-Fungus-Fix-Review-150x150.jpg
307 ms
FixaFungus-Toenail-Fungus-Treatment-Review-150x150.png
310 ms
Natures-Edge-Phytoceramides-Review-150x150.jpg
1161 ms
Longvida-Optimized-Curcumin-Review-150x150.jpg
1163 ms
Healthorium-Phytoceramides-Review-150x150.jpg
312 ms
1MD-Turmeric-Curcumin-Review-150x150.png
1153 ms
Piping-Rock-Phytoceramides-Review-150x150.jpg
1153 ms
Life-Extension-Forskolin-150x150.jpg
1152 ms
Fungix-Review-150x150.png
1352 ms
Turmeric-Premium-Review-150x150.png
1350 ms
ResearchVerified-Turmeric-Curcumin-Review-150x150.png
1349 ms
ResearchVerifieds-Phytoceramides-Review-150x150.jpg
1319 ms
310-150x150.png
1320 ms
turmeric-150x150.jpg
1352 ms
Natural-Vitality-Natural-Calm-150x150.jpg
1352 ms
Puritans-Pride-5-HTP-Review-150x150.jpg
2238 ms
Earth%E2%80%99s-Favor-PhytoRenew-Review-150x150.jpg
2448 ms
Rice-Phytoceramides-Revive-Dr.-Naturel-150x150.jpg
2237 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1352 ms
style.css
1581 ms
blocks.style.build.css
2304 ms
css
182 ms
analytics.js
293 ms
style.min.css
1604 ms
styles.css
1872 ms
slick.css
1810 ms
sfsi-style.css
1997 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYCSUhiCnAw.ttf
128 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYCSUhiCnAw.ttf
978 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYCSUhiCnAw.ttf
1179 ms
EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrq_dSb_.ttf
1147 ms
EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy7Vp8NA.ttf
1178 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
122 ms
style.min.css
1915 ms
EJRTQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT_r21dwT9rcs.ttf
1147 ms
EJRQQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT9gaQZynfpeFC-I0.ttf
1143 ms
style.css
2269 ms
style.css
2096 ms
animate.css
1994 ms
customstyles.css.php
2368 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2183 ms
stars-small.png
2180 ms
sdk.js
1081 ms
collect
954 ms
reviewcritic.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
reviewcritic.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
reviewcritic.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewcritic.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviewcritic.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewcritic.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Critic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: