4.3 sec in total
246 ms
1.6 sec
2.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Reviewing Momma content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviewingmomma.com
Visit reviewingmomma.comWe analyzed Reviewingmomma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 246 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
reviewingmomma.com performance score
246 ms
227 ms
115 ms
176 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewingmomma.com, 20% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewingmomma.com.
Page size can be reduced by 220.5 kB (21%)
1.1 MB
839.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewingmomma.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 742.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviewing Momma images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewingmomma.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (31%)
29
20
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewing Momma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewingmomma.com
246 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
227 ms
css
115 ms
genericons.css
176 ms
style.css
168 ms
jquery.js
226 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
154 ms
masonry.min.js
160 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
221 ms
functions.js
301 ms
wp-embed.min.js
301 ms
css
53 ms
pixel.png
782 ms
A14Wu3rEf-L._SX522_.jpg
840 ms
IMG_1381-e1443149402978-768x1024.jpg
1090 ms
IMG_0108-1024x683.jpg
998 ms
915earEAfQL._UL1500_-300x300.jpg
753 ms
715JjJWRVKL._SL1500_-196x300.jpg
748 ms
71lIqTSh2L._SL1500_-300x231.jpg
749 ms
71w-kmyR06L._SL256_.jpg
753 ms
91W58BMGG6L._SL1500_-200x300.jpg
808 ms
image1-300x261.jpg
804 ms
image2-300x252.jpg
805 ms
image-231x300.jpg
891 ms
facebook.png
897 ms
twitter.png
889 ms
pinterest.png
896 ms
instagram.png
980 ms
circle.png
899 ms
search-icon.png
876 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
768 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
824 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf
783 ms
QNNVW1nta25A1TfGw7wquPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
686 ms
Pb6nMVFTTNIRQ-6dLfiuqg.ttf
696 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
621 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6I48KljrVa8Zcyi9xGGohEU.ttf
803 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM6xot8ENfkYez2Lz7rcrw70.ttf
802 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6KQ4IK8jcFikBX2R8jKe4LU.ttf
764 ms
pixel.png
253 ms
reviewingmomma.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewingmomma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewingmomma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewingmomma.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviewing Momma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: