Tools & Wizards About Us
reviewrooster.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

reviewrooster.net

Review Rooster | Tech Reviews, News, Prices & What Not! – Review Rooster

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

reviewrooster.net screenshot

About Website

Visit reviewrooster.net now to see the best up-to-date Review Rooster content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewrooster.net

Review Rooster is a one-stop platform for all trending tech-stuff in the market. We review the items, report news & trends and do products comparison.

Visit reviewrooster.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewrooster.net page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewrooster.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reviewrooster.net

168 ms

reviewrooster.net

295 ms

styles.css

59 ms

style.css

118 ms

lightbox.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewrooster.net, 16% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (463 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviewrooster.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 105.8 kB (23%)

Content Size

466.8 kB

After Optimization

361.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reviewrooster.net main page is 466.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 140.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 100.4 kB

  • Original 119.2 kB
  • After minification 114.8 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 139.8 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Rooster images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 61 B

  • Original 140.3 kB
  • After minification 140.3 kB
  • After compression 140.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 67.5 kB
  • After minification 67.5 kB
  • After compression 63.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewrooster.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (83%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Rooster. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reviewrooster.net

reviewrooster.net

168 ms

reviewrooster.net

reviewrooster.net

295 ms

styles.css

styles.css

59 ms

style.css

style.css

118 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

160 ms

icons.css

icons.css

162 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

161 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

163 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

165 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

170 ms

post-1618.css

post-1618.css

212 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

213 ms

css

css

45 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

268 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

218 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

solid.css

solid.css

62 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

82 ms

js

js

68 ms

onejs

onejs

11 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

215 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

220 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

261 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

367 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

366 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

366 ms

index.js

index.js

366 ms

index.js

index.js

366 ms

jquery.mfp-lightbox.js

jquery.mfp-lightbox.js

367 ms

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

366 ms

theme.js

theme.js

379 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

367 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

463 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

370 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

397 ms

logom2_ykscom.png

logom2_ykscom.png

243 ms

SMARTMAG-BANNER-1200-20-1@2x.jpg

SMARTMAG-BANNER-1200-20-1@2x.jpg

165 ms

reviewrooster_eacb38210f093eebe2eb7343660a67f9.png

reviewrooster_eacb38210f093eebe2eb7343660a67f9.png

63 ms

300X6000-AD-01@2x.jpg

300X6000-AD-01@2x.jpg

189 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

19 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

38 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

70 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjp-Ek-_0ew.woff

58 ms

ts-icons.woff

ts-icons.woff

70 ms

U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXfTTPMRiX_V61by.woff

U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXfTTPMRiX_V61by.woff

205 ms

U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXe3TfMRiX_V61by.woff

U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXe3TfMRiX_V61by.woff

72 ms

U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXf_S_MRiX_V61by.woff

U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXf_S_MRiX_V61by.woff

96 ms

U9MD6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRX8MaOA8q3T_.woff

U9MD6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRX8MaOA8q3T_.woff

70 ms

reviewrooster_eacb38210f093eebe2eb7343660a67f9.png

reviewrooster_eacb38210f093eebe2eb7343660a67f9.png

69 ms

Accessibility Review

reviewrooster.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

reviewrooster.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

reviewrooster.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewrooster.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewrooster.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reviewrooster.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Rooster. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: