3.1 sec in total
138 ms
1.9 sec
1.1 sec
Visit reviewrooster.net now to see the best up-to-date Review Rooster content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewrooster.net
Review Rooster is a one-stop platform for all trending tech-stuff in the market. We review the items, report news & trends and do products comparison.
Visit reviewrooster.netWe analyzed Reviewrooster.net page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
reviewrooster.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
138 ms
298 ms
58 ms
113 ms
220 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewrooster.net, 17% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Res.cloudinary.com.
Page size can be reduced by 104.8 kB (21%)
508.1 kB
403.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewrooster.net main page is 508.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 181.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Rooster images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 84 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewrooster.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (79%)
34
7
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Rooster. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewrooster.net
138 ms
reviewrooster.net
298 ms
styles.css
58 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
113 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
220 ms
swiper.min.css
174 ms
post-1618.css
167 ms
post-6.css
172 ms
style.css
227 ms
lightbox.css
167 ms
icons.css
223 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.min.js
277 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
225 ms
font-awesome.min.css
36 ms
solid.css
132 ms
fontawesome.css
172 ms
js
66 ms
onejs
11 ms
lazyload.js
235 ms
index.js
271 ms
index.js
274 ms
jquery.mfp-lightbox.js
379 ms
jquery.sticky-sidebar.js
380 ms
theme.js
402 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
402 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
439 ms
waypoints.min.js
401 ms
core.min.js
401 ms
frontend.min.js
401 ms
logom2_ykscom.png
1113 ms
SMARTMAG-BANNER-1200-20-1@2x.jpg
186 ms
300X6000-AD-01@2x.jpg
245 ms
js
97 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjg.woff
46 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjg.woff
46 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjg.woff
74 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjg.woff
93 ms
ts-icons.woff
92 ms
U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXfTTPMRiX8.woff
158 ms
U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXe3TfMRiX8.woff
159 ms
U9MM6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRXf_S_MRiX8.woff
159 ms
U9MD6c-2-nnJkHxyCjRcnMHcWVWV1cWRRX8MaOA.woff
157 ms
collect
54 ms
reviewrooster_eacb38210f093eebe2eb7343660a67f9.png
92 ms
reviewrooster.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
reviewrooster.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
reviewrooster.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewrooster.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewrooster.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewrooster.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Rooster. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: