4.2 sec in total
229 ms
3.7 sec
307 ms
Welcome to reviewshepherd.com homepage info - get ready to check Review Shepherd best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about reviewshepherd.com
Learn how to get more five star Google, Yelp and Facebook reviews. Buy our review building software today.
Visit reviewshepherd.comWe analyzed Reviewshepherd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
reviewshepherd.com performance score
229 ms
2191 ms
285 ms
186 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewshepherd.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewshepherd.com.
Page size can be reduced by 827.6 kB (51%)
1.6 MB
792.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewshepherd.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 685.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Shepherd images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 486.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 486.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 302.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewshepherd.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 302.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (57%)
72
31
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Shepherd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewshepherd.com
229 ms
reviewshepherd.com
2191 ms
style.css
285 ms
stylesheet.css
186 ms
stylesheet.css
185 ms
stylesheet.css
186 ms
stylesheet.css
200 ms
stylesheet.css
199 ms
media-queries.css
307 ms
jquery-1.8.3.js
787 ms
nav-script.js
264 ms
jqueryslidemenu.js
266 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
388 ms
ui.core.js
321 ms
ui.combobox.js
329 ms
ui.combobox.css
330 ms
contries.js
525 ms
css.reviewshepherd.css
380 ms
colorbox.css
392 ms
script.reviewshepherd.js
454 ms
font-awesome.min.css
440 ms
cnss.css
446 ms
styles.css
454 ms
jquery.js
612 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
506 ms
cnss.js
522 ms
script.reviewshepherd.js
581 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
564 ms
reviewsh.script2.js
586 ms
core.min.js
349 ms
widget.min.js
383 ms
mouse.min.js
405 ms
sortable.min.js
470 ms
scripts.js
414 ms
wp-embed.min.js
430 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
64 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
XS9cocWxD74
121 ms
rs-bg.jpg
113 ms
rs-logo2.png
70 ms
rs-nav-slice.jpg
111 ms
rs-nav-line.jpg
72 ms
rs-tel.png
118 ms
rs-banner-slice.jpg
118 ms
rs-dot-slice.png
159 ms
rs-slide-left.png
163 ms
rs-slide-right.png
160 ms
search-you.png
344 ms
rs-risk-button1.png
300 ms
rs-monitor.png
475 ms
rs-risk-button2.png
343 ms
Banner-199.jpg
358 ms
rs-bullet.jpg
344 ms
rs-banner-busy.jpg
343 ms
rs-banner.jpg
605 ms
1420437451_rs-facebook.png
363 ms
1420437477_rs-twitter.png
366 ms
1420437508_rs-linkedin.png
363 ms
1420437496_rs-googleplus.png
425 ms
cross.png
424 ms
rs-logo-sm.jpg
441 ms
opensans-regular-webfont-webfont.woff
420 ms
opensans-semibold-webfont.woff
514 ms
adelleregularwebfont-webfont.woff
461 ms
collect
51 ms
fbevents.js
46 ms
collect
235 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
11 ms
www-embed-player.js
35 ms
base.js
51 ms
1046655928798115
219 ms
id
146 ms
T8Ys39_ecZUP0z5o0qwgiftCx6c5Z_CDv350QIo51NY.js
146 ms
ad_status.js
127 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
60 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
65 ms
logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png
70 ms
806114782838674
77 ms
14 ms
12 ms
reviewshepherd.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewshepherd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewshepherd.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewshepherd.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Shepherd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: