7.9 sec in total
1.8 sec
4.7 sec
1.4 sec
Welcome to reviewsherald.com homepage info - get ready to check Reviews Herald best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviewsherald.com
Visit reviewsherald.comWe analyzed Reviewsherald.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
reviewsherald.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value2,030 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
1831 ms
133 ms
488 ms
246 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewsherald.com, 29% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewsherald.com.
Page size can be reduced by 555.0 kB (40%)
1.4 MB
834.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewsherald.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 729.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviews Herald images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 188.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 264.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewsherald.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 264.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (24%)
55
42
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviews Herald. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewsherald.com
1831 ms
bootstrap.min.css
133 ms
style.min.css
488 ms
reset.css
246 ms
font-awesome.css
105 ms
style.css
267 ms
style-sports.css
229 ms
media-queries.css
378 ms
jquery.min.js
375 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
257 ms
comment-reply.min.js
218 ms
scripts.js
733 ms
retina.js
727 ms
css
70 ms
analytics.js
958 ms
reviewsherald.jpg
1215 ms
body_shop_almond_hand_nail_cream.jpg
1221 ms
body_shop_almond_hand_nail_cream-450x270.jpg
1032 ms
maybelline_brow_drama_mascara.jpg
1013 ms
maybelline_brow_drama_mascara-450x270.jpg
1051 ms
strawberry-body-mist_z.jpg
1503 ms
strawberry-body-mist_z-450x270.jpg
1205 ms
Lakm%C3%A9-Clean-Up-Face-Wash-Review.jpg
1200 ms
Lakm%C3%A9-Clean-Up-Face-Wash-Review-400x270.jpg
1197 ms
baby-massage-oil-300x180.jpg
1196 ms
baby-massage-oil-80x80.jpg
1540 ms
Almond-oil-daily-hand-nail-cream-250x180.jpg
1540 ms
Almond-oil-daily-hand-nail-cream-80x80.jpg
1538 ms
bbw_sweetpea-300x180.jpg
1538 ms
bbw_sweetpea-80x80.jpg
1538 ms
reviews-herald-300x180.jpg
1563 ms
reviews-herald-80x80.jpg
1584 ms
maybelline_brow_drama_mascara-300x180.jpg
1583 ms
maybelline_brow_drama_mascara-80x80.jpg
1571 ms
chambor-eye-pencil-300x180.png
1568 ms
chambor-eye-pencil-80x80.png
1567 ms
body_shop_almond_hand_nail_cream-300x180.jpg
1584 ms
body_shop_almond_hand_nail_cream-80x80.jpg
1597 ms
garnier-fructis-long-and-strong-strengthening-serum-100-ml-300x180.jpg
1597 ms
garnier-fructis-long-and-strong-strengthening-serum-100-ml-80x80.jpg
1597 ms
VLCC-Hibiscus-Anti-Hair-Fall-Shampoo-500x500-300x180.jpg
1596 ms
VLCC-Hibiscus-Anti-Hair-Fall-Shampoo-500x500-80x80.jpg
1597 ms
Tigi-Catwalk-300x180.jpg
1604 ms
Tigi-Catwalk-80x80.jpg
1603 ms
reviewsherald-1.jpg
1479 ms
Garnier-Men-Face-Wash-275x180.png
1594 ms
Garnier-Men-Face-Wash-80x80.png
1583 ms
maybelline-baby-lips-300x180.jpg
1584 ms
maybelline-baby-lips-80x80.jpg
1584 ms
DSC_0746-300x180.jpg
1579 ms
DSC_0746-80x80.jpg
1580 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
261 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
331 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
305 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
407 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
310 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
305 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
280 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
702 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf
700 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf
699 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
707 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
706 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf
736 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf
730 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
387 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBiEJow.ttf
752 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBiEJow.ttf
752 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBiEJow.ttf
728 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBiEJow.ttf
751 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBiEJow.ttf
774 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBiEJow.ttf
773 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBiEJow.ttf
774 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBiEJow.ttf
796 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBiEJow.ttf
796 ms
linkid.js
662 ms
Badger-Damascus-Rose-Beauty-Balm-300x180.jpg
624 ms
Badger-Damascus-Rose-Beauty-Balm-80x80.jpg
613 ms
Garnier-Skin-Renew-Anti-Puff-Eye-Roller-300x180.jpg
600 ms
Garnier-Skin-Renew-Anti-Puff-Eye-Roller-80x80.jpg
564 ms
reviewsherald.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reviewsherald.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
reviewsherald.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewsherald.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewsherald.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewsherald.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviews Herald. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: