1.3 sec in total
87 ms
1 sec
142 ms
Click here to check amazing Reviewweb content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviewweb.us
ReviewWeb - best review and free analysis for webmasters, deverloper, seoer that gathers detailed information on your domain : traffic details, Technology language, whois, ranking info, domain backlin...
Visit reviewweb.usWe analyzed Reviewweb.us page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
reviewweb.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
87 ms
80 ms
164 ms
55 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reviewweb.us, 19% (7 requests) were made to Reviewourwebsites.org and 14% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (288 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 652.6 kB (63%)
1.0 MB
380.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewweb.us main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 719.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reviewweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 435.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 435.1 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewweb.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (41%)
29
17
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewweb.us
87 ms
www.reviewourwebsites.org
80 ms
bootstrap.css
164 ms
style.css
55 ms
geo_data.js
63 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
bootstrap.min.js
95 ms
addthis_widget.js
9 ms
logo.png
67 ms
css
26 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
bg-header.png
71 ms
bg-footer.png
71 ms
ca-pub-0793232849423114.js
187 ms
zrt_lookup.html
185 ms
show_ads_impl.js
115 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
104 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
178 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
37 ms
300lo.json
159 ms
collect
139 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
187 ms
ads
232 ms
osd.js
50 ms
ads
288 ms
ads
246 ms
m_js_controller.js
21 ms
abg.js
34 ms
favicon
46 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
36 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
26 ms
s
14 ms
x_button_blue2.png
9 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
44 ms
7794372913059492276
37 ms
favicon
22 ms
reviewweb.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
reviewweb.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
reviewweb.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewweb.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Reviewweb.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewweb.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reviewweb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: