Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

revisionsresources.org

ReVisions Resources

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

94 ms

revisionsresources.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to revisionsresources.org homepage info - get ready to check Re Visions Resources best content right away, or after learning these important things about revisionsresources.org

Visit revisionsresources.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Revisionsresources.org page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

revisionsresources.org performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.148

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

revisionsresources.org

27 ms

www.revisionsresources.org

3417 ms

webfont.js

43 ms

js_composer_front.css

17 ms

common-skeleton.min.css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Revisionsresources.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Revisionsresources.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 852.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Revisionsresources.org main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 846.8 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Re Visions Resources needs image optimization as it can save up to 846.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 9.5 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 15.8 kB
  • After minification 15.6 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revisionsresources.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (42%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

47

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Visions Resources. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

revisionsresources.org accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

revisionsresources.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

revisionsresources.org SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revisionsresources.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Revisionsresources.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Re Visions Resources. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: