1.9 sec in total
161 ms
1.5 sec
236 ms
Click here to check amazing RFID JOURNAL content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rfidjournal.com
Visit rfidjournal.comWe analyzed Rfidjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rfidjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value2,890 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.488
17/100
15%
Value22.7 s
1/100
10%
161 ms
120 ms
88 ms
102 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Rfidjournal.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (503 ms) belongs to the original domain Rfidjournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 177.4 kB (18%)
974.6 kB
797.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfidjournal.com main page is 974.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 693.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 146.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RFID JOURNAL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 97 (86%)
113
16
The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RFID JOURNAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfidjournal.com
161 ms
www.rfidjournal.com
120 ms
bootstrap.min.css
88 ms
font-awesome.min.css
102 ms
style.css
70 ms
bootstrap.min.js
116 ms
OtAutoBlock.js
110 ms
otSDKStub.js
129 ms
leaflet.min.css
103 ms
font-awesome.min.css
122 ms
style.css
155 ms
rtl.css
124 ms
dwqa-akismet-button-report-spam.css
139 ms
password-lost.css
138 ms
wpa.css
141 ms
prettyPhoto.min.css
170 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
162 ms
woocommerce.css
176 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
181 ms
directory.min.css
172 ms
polls-css.css
203 ms
slick.css
214 ms
recent-post-style.css
222 ms
pagenavi-css.css
204 ms
if-menu-site.css
220 ms
public.css
222 ms
formreset.min.css
281 ms
formsmain.min.css
240 ms
readyclass.min.css
252 ms
browsers.min.css
269 ms
slick.css
96 ms
css
108 ms
style.min.css
272 ms
leaderboard.css
270 ms
favorites.css
276 ms
pum-site-styles.css
296 ms
addtoany.min.css
321 ms
style-static.min.css
354 ms
listnav.css
323 ms
style.css
317 ms
style-front-end.css
331 ms
page.js
101 ms
jquery.min.js
90 ms
addtoany.min.js
337 ms
dwqa-akismet-button-report-spam.js
353 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
397 ms
slick.min.js
106 ms
jquery.min.js
91 ms
api.js
100 ms
v2.js
109 ms
p.js
81 ms
wc-blocks.css
395 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
344 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
309 ms
underscore.min.js
299 ms
infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js
292 ms
5a52c835-9ddf-448c-bf74-3835fc6dfe4c.json
30 ms
front.js
286 ms
custom.js
288 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
320 ms
js.cookie.min.js
278 ms
location
55 ms
woocommerce.min.js
318 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
287 ms
jquery.directory.min.js
289 ms
jquery.json.min.js
284 ms
gravityforms.min.js
291 ms
utils.min.js
298 ms
ds-script.js
279 ms
favorites.min.js
298 ms
password-lost.js
283 ms
wpa.js
320 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
321 ms
order-attribution.min.js
298 ms
polls-js.js
352 ms
public.js
335 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
291 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
332 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
283 ms
dom-ready.min.js
325 ms
css
24 ms
hooks.min.js
314 ms
i18n.min.js
292 ms
a11y.min.js
289 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
288 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
302 ms
loader.js
297 ms
jquery-listnav.js
329 ms
scripts.min.js
287 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
339 ms
core.min.js
283 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
340 ms
common.js
337 ms
slick.min.js
280 ms
wppsac-public.js
340 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
336 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
333 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
430 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
299 ms
easypiechart.js
364 ms
salvattore.js
398 ms
mainlogo.png
326 ms
HID-Global-Tasmanian-Distillery-Brand-Protection-Image-5.jpg
458 ms
USDA-Cattle-Adobe.jpeg
457 ms
Stella-Invetsors-Adobe.jpeg
456 ms
Cargo-Airplane-Adobe.jpeg
459 ms
rfdi-logo-white.png
459 ms
emelarld-logo.png
453 ms
top-bg.jpg
451 ms
rightar.png
503 ms
webinar-featured.jpg
502 ms
play.png
432 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
55 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
74 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
120 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
121 ms
modules.woff
457 ms
ajax-loader.gif
243 ms
privacyoptions29x14.png
78 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
101 ms
rfidjournal.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rfidjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rfidjournal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfidjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfidjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfidjournal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RFID JOURNAL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: