Tools & Wizards About Us
rgimt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rgimt.com

Rajiv Gandhi Institute of management and technology | Distance Education in Nagpur, Correspondence Courses

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

223 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

471 ms

rgimt.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rgimt.com now to see the best up-to-date Rgimt content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rgimt.com

RGIMT School of Distance Education is one of the largest autonomous distance learning institute for MBA equivalent courses in Nagpur, India. Online PGDM, Distance MBA, MBA Correspondence and Post Grad...

Visit rgimt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rgimt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rgimt.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rgimt.com

223 ms

rgimt.com

1039 ms

bootstrap.css

305 ms

style.css

576 ms

responsive.css

359 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Rgimt.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rgimt.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (45%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rgimt.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 28.4 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.8 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 110.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rgimt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 341.7 kB

  • Original 438.0 kB
  • After minification 323.9 kB
  • After compression 96.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 341.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 558.4 kB

  • Original 642.2 kB
  • After minification 558.7 kB
  • After compression 83.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgimt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 558.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rgimt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rgimt.com

rgimt.com

223 ms

rgimt.com

rgimt.com

1039 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

305 ms

style.css

style.css

576 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

359 ms

color-switcher-design.css

color-switcher-design.css

293 ms

rgimt-logo.png

rgimt-logo.png

344 ms

regLogo2.png

regLogo2.png

344 ms

payu.png

payu.png

366 ms

rgimt-small-logo.png

rgimt-small-logo.png

376 ms

banner_1.jpg

banner_1.jpg

420 ms

CILT_International.png

CILT_International.png

681 ms

banner_2.jpg

banner_2.jpg

433 ms

banner_3.jpg

banner_3.jpg

572 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

451 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

459 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

479 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

598 ms

owl.js

owl.js

636 ms

wow.js

wow.js

568 ms

appear.js

appear.js

598 ms

jquery.modal.min.js

jquery.modal.min.js

597 ms

script.js

script.js

659 ms

color-settings.js

color-settings.js

677 ms

IADL1.jpg

IADL1.jpg

676 ms

IAF1.jpg

IAF1.jpg

678 ms

CILT.jpg

CILT.jpg

693 ms

client1.png

client1.png

706 ms

client2.png

client2.png

732 ms

client3.png

client3.png

751 ms

css

css

33 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

250 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

247 ms

animate.css

animate.css

260 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

281 ms

owl.css

owl.css

289 ms

jquery.modal.min.css

jquery.modal.min.css

314 ms

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.css

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.css

324 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

325 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

349 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

171 ms

icon-devider.png

icon-devider.png

169 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

170 ms

icon-certificate.png

icon-certificate.png

169 ms

dotted-map.png

dotted-map.png

171 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

21 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

30 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

54 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

64 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

91 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

91 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

90 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyL.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyL.woff

65 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyL.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyL.woff

64 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7w.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7w.woff

65 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyL.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyL.woff

64 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

199 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

117 ms

Accessibility Review

rgimt.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rgimt.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rgimt.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgimt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rgimt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rgimt.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rgimt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: