4.2 sec in total
478 ms
3.5 sec
276 ms
Click here to check amazing Rhi Cap content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rhicap.com
RHI is specialized in producing pipe caps, pvc caps, rubber caps, round caps, bolt caps, vinyl caps, terminal cap, plastic cap etc. OEM is welcome.
Visit rhicap.comWe analyzed Rhicap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 478 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rhicap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.401
25/100
15%
Value6.8 s
56/100
10%
478 ms
19 ms
334 ms
45 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Rhicap.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rhicap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 197.2 kB (11%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rhicap.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rhi Cap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhicap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (26%)
35
26
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhi Cap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rhicap.com
478 ms
basic.css
19 ms
index_cn.css
334 ms
email-decode.min.js
45 ms
lang_json_cn.js
233 ms
basic.js
47 ms
js
121 ms
1517059956.png
102 ms
1517060643.png
102 ms
1517060144.png
267 ms
1517060573.png
250 ms
1517060475.png
251 ms
1519264430.jpg
331 ms
1583992207.jpg
534 ms
1519455565.jpg
512 ms
1519458470.jpg
710 ms
1517057694.png
490 ms
1517059440.png
592 ms
1517057952.png
558 ms
1519537495.jpg
921 ms
1517057889.png
728 ms
1520060702.jpg
1120 ms
1545019572.jpg
985 ms
1544773225.jpg
1035 ms
1544688017.jpg
1163 ms
1540443983.jpg
1109 ms
1542354190.jpg
1321 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1129 ms
index_cn.js
1304 ms
156 ms
ajax-loader.gif
241 ms
loading.gif
240 ms
1581575728.jpg
360 ms
1581577909.jpg
338 ms
1581930618.jpg
337 ms
1581578486.jpg
409 ms
slick.woff
310 ms
online.css
350 ms
rhicap.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rhicap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rhicap.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhicap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rhicap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rhicap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rhi Cap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: