Tools & Wizards About Us
ricardos.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ricardos.com

【RICARDOS WEBSITE】

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

893 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

131 ms

ricardos.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ricardos.com now to see the best up-to-date RICARDOS content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ricardos.com

Ricardo Dödschlag - NOTES, WHICH WE SHOULDN'T FORGET!

Visit ricardos.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ricardos.com page load time and found that the first response time was 893 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ricardos.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.298

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ricardos.com

893 ms

divi-widgets.css

320 ms

style.min.css

443 ms

style.css

331 ms

magnific_popup.css

332 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Ricardos.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Accounts.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (893 ms) belongs to the original domain Ricardos.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

807.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ricardos.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 374.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 235.4 kB

  • Original 288.3 kB
  • After minification 283.9 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 235.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 292 B

  • Original 150.8 kB
  • After minification 150.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RICARDOS images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 374.1 kB
  • After minification 374.1 kB
  • After compression 368.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 238.8 kB
  • After minification 238.8 kB
  • After compression 235.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ricardos.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 89 (94%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RICARDOS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 78 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ricardos.com

www.ricardos.com

893 ms

divi-widgets.css

divi-widgets.css

320 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

443 ms

style.css

style.css

331 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

332 ms

animate.css

animate.css

336 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

341 ms

style.instances-ho-is-po-no-da-co-au-ga-se-is.css

style.instances-ho-is-po-no-da-co-au-ga-se-is.css

428 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

443 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

333 ms

style.css

style.css

339 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

340 ms

ricardos-logo-v3.png

ricardos-logo-v3.png

221 ms

ricardos-logo-v3-white.png

ricardos-logo-v3-white.png

213 ms

Photologo_Sig_7-min.png

Photologo_Sig_7-min.png

214 ms

js

js

71 ms

thrive_flat.css

thrive_flat.css

559 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

446 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

338 ms

particles.js

particles.js

410 ms

rellax.js

rellax.js

410 ms

tilt.js

tilt.js

447 ms

magnific-popups.js

magnific-popups.js

450 ms

more-social-icons.js

more-social-icons.js

451 ms

jt-divi-material-blurb.js

jt-divi-material-blurb.js

451 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

553 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

562 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

561 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

670 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

563 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

785 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

665 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

666 ms

asp-prereq.js

asp-prereq.js

669 ms

asp-core.js

asp-core.js

679 ms

asp-settings.js

asp-settings.js

774 ms

asp-compact.js

asp-compact.js

774 ms

client

client

61 ms

api.js

api.js

30 ms

asp-results-vertical.js

asp-results-vertical.js

774 ms

asp-ga.js

asp-ga.js

671 ms

asp-live.js

asp-live.js

672 ms

asp-load.js

asp-load.js

762 ms

asp-wrapper.js

asp-wrapper.js

763 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

758 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

756 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

685 ms

ally-plugins.js

ally-plugins.js

691 ms

ally-custom-scripts.js

ally-custom-scripts.js

771 ms

common.js

common.js

767 ms

toolbox-scripts.js

toolbox-scripts.js

766 ms

typed.js

typed.js

762 ms

overlays.js

overlays.js

765 ms

acf-dynamic-elements.min.js

acf-dynamic-elements.min.js

678 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-2696-1881-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-2696-1881-late.css

692 ms

audio.min.js

audio.min.js

746 ms

carousel-libs.min.js

carousel-libs.min.js

747 ms

carousel.min.js

carousel.min.js

710 ms

contact-form-compat.min.js

contact-form-compat.min.js

710 ms

content-reveal.min.js

content-reveal.min.js

708 ms

countdown.min.js

countdown.min.js

759 ms

conditional-display.min.js

conditional-display.min.js

762 ms

search-form.min.js

search-form.min.js

663 ms

dropdown.min.js

dropdown.min.js

660 ms

divider.min.js

divider.min.js

658 ms

moxie.min.js

moxie.min.js

676 ms

plupload.min.js

plupload.min.js

755 ms

file-upload.min.js

file-upload.min.js

654 ms

avatar-picker.min.js

avatar-picker.min.js

662 ms

fill-counter.min.js

fill-counter.min.js

660 ms

number-counter.min.js

number-counter.min.js

660 ms

image-gallery-libs.min.js

image-gallery-libs.min.js

670 ms

image-gallery.min.js

image-gallery.min.js

651 ms

lead-generation.min.js

lead-generation.min.js

655 ms

login.min.js

login.min.js

656 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

658 ms

number-counter-compat.min.js

number-counter-compat.min.js

651 ms

post-grid-compat.min.js

post-grid-compat.min.js

668 ms

pagination.min.js

pagination.min.js

652 ms

post-list.min.js

post-list.min.js

655 ms

post-list-filter.min.js

post-list-filter.min.js

656 ms

pricing-table.min.js

pricing-table.min.js

656 ms

progress-bar.min.js

progress-bar.min.js

652 ms

social-share.min.js

social-share.min.js

668 ms

table.min.js

table.min.js

652 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

654 ms

timer.min.js

timer.min.js

653 ms

toc.min.js

toc.min.js

655 ms

toggle.min.js

toggle.min.js

652 ms

twitter.min.js

twitter.min.js

663 ms

user-profile.min.js

user-profile.min.js

599 ms

video.min.js

video.min.js

604 ms

google-api.min.js

google-api.min.js

605 ms

facebook-api.min.js

facebook-api.min.js

606 ms

modal.min.js

modal.min.js

607 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

686 ms

WP_20160313_18_21_52_Pro__highres.jpg

WP_20160313_18_21_52_Pro__highres.jpg

866 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

110 ms

Accessibility Review

ricardos.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ricardos.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ricardos.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ricardos.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Ricardos.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ricardos.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RICARDOS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: