8.5 sec in total
59 ms
8.1 sec
304 ms
Visit ricelake.org now to see the best up-to-date Rice Lake content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ricelake.org
A full service contractor, Rice Lake Construction specializes in wastewater treatment plant and water treatment plant construction projects.
Visit ricelake.orgWe analyzed Ricelake.org page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ricelake.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value16.1 s
0/100
25%
Value18.2 s
0/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
59 ms
579 ms
334 ms
355 ms
374 ms
Our browser made a total of 143 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (136 requests) were addressed to the original Ricelake.org, 1% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ricelake.org.
Page size can be reduced by 206.9 kB (11%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Ricelake.org main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rice Lake images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ricelake.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.1 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 133 (96%)
138
5
The browser has sent 138 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rice Lake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 101 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ricelake.org
59 ms
www.ricelake.org
579 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
334 ms
style.min.css
355 ms
styles.css
374 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
375 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
363 ms
style.css
367 ms
font-awesome.min.css
471 ms
style.min.css
534 ms
style.css
510 ms
dripicons.css
446 ms
kiko-all.css
412 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
586 ms
stylesheet.min.css
805 ms
print.css
737 ms
style_dynamic_callback.php
1840 ms
responsive.min.css
964 ms
style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php
1700 ms
js_composer.min.css
981 ms
css
371 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
1034 ms
style.css
1049 ms
jquery.min.js
1071 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1063 ms
rbtools.min.js
1084 ms
rs6.min.js
1094 ms
rs6.css
1050 ms
index.js
1064 ms
index.js
1112 ms
core.min.js
1112 ms
accordion.min.js
1076 ms
menu.min.js
1076 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1106 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1105 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1127 ms
hooks.min.js
1125 ms
i18n.min.js
1149 ms
api.js
240 ms
a11y.min.js
1136 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1061 ms
controlgroup.min.js
1013 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
1026 ms
button.min.js
1022 ms
datepicker.min.js
1039 ms
mouse.min.js
1040 ms
resizable.min.js
968 ms
draggable.min.js
954 ms
dialog.min.js
958 ms
droppable.min.js
827 ms
progressbar.min.js
754 ms
selectable.min.js
741 ms
sortable.min.js
662 ms
slider.min.js
446 ms
spinner.min.js
476 ms
tooltip.min.js
426 ms
tabs.min.js
430 ms
effect.min.js
417 ms
effect-blind.min.js
430 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
423 ms
effect-clip.min.js
398 ms
effect-drop.min.js
385 ms
effect-explode.min.js
409 ms
effect-fade.min.js
392 ms
effect-fold.min.js
382 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
381 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
384 ms
effect-size.min.js
388 ms
effect-scale.min.js
377 ms
effect-shake.min.js
377 ms
effect-slide.min.js
380 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
377 ms
doubletaptogo.js
381 ms
modernizr.min.js
378 ms
jquery.appear.js
390 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
388 ms
counter.js
374 ms
easypiechart.js
372 ms
mixitup.js
396 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
384 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
365 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
363 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
390 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
381 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
362 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
366 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
364 ms
jquery.form.min.js
380 ms
waypoints.min.js
358 ms
jplayer.min.js
359 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
355 ms
skrollr.js
357 ms
Chart.min.js
527 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
524 ms
abstractBaseClass.js
513 ms
jquery.countdown.js
572 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
547 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
568 ms
bigtext.js
668 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
669 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
671 ms
typed.js
666 ms
fluidvids.min.js
638 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
682 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
717 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
726 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
695 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
719 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
683 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
683 ms
jquery.stretch.js
698 ms
imagesloaded.js
699 ms
rangeslider.min.js
705 ms
jquery.event.move.js
695 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
711 ms
swiper.min.js
721 ms
default_dynamic_callback.php
2484 ms
default.min.js
732 ms
comment-reply.min.js
697 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
709 ms
qode-like.min.js
705 ms
index.js
710 ms
RLC_Logo_600px.png
685 ms
NEW_Water.jpg
757 ms
Wastewater1.jpg
749 ms
Industrial_B.jpg
748 ms
Commerical.jpg
755 ms
ga.js
240 ms
AboutUs_NEW.jpg
765 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
688 ms
Water.jpg
688 ms
Wastewater-1.jpg
668 ms
Industrial_NEW.jpg
610 ms
Commercial_NEW-1.jpg
641 ms
culture-of-care-bw.jpg
659 ms
__utm.gif
93 ms
facebook.png
559 ms
linkedIn.png
558 ms
collect
103 ms
instagram.png
558 ms
twitter.png
557 ms
ga-audiences
19 ms
recaptcha__en.js
85 ms
ricelake.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ricelake.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ricelake.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ricelake.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ricelake.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ricelake.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rice Lake. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: