3.8 sec in total
706 ms
3 sec
134 ms
Welcome to richard-wolf.com homepage info - get ready to check Richard Wolf best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about richard-wolf.com
Richard Wolf ist eines der führenden Medizintechnikunternehmen im Bereich der Endoskopie. Entdecken Sie unsere Produkte für Ihre Fachdisziplin!
Visit richard-wolf.comWe analyzed Richard-wolf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 706 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
richard-wolf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.742
6/100
15%
Value7.2 s
50/100
10%
706 ms
98 ms
194 ms
195 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Richard-wolf.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Etracker.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (706 ms) belongs to the original domain Richard-wolf.com.
Page size can be reduced by 545.1 kB (48%)
1.1 MB
599.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Richard-wolf.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 549.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Richard Wolf needs image optimization as it can save up to 105.3 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 179.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 215.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richard-wolf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (65%)
65
23
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richard Wolf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
endoscopes.html
706 ms
stylesheet_d56fbbf2ab.css
98 ms
FrontEnd.css
194 ms
Main.css
195 ms
cookies.min.css
198 ms
swipebox.css
197 ms
snet_rw_products.css
196 ms
femanager.css
195 ms
felogin.css
288 ms
snetcookies.css
289 ms
normalize.css
293 ms
bootstrap.css
298 ms
style_v.css
293 ms
styles_basic.css
294 ms
print.css
385 ms
newsslider.css
384 ms
galleria.css
390 ms
seminars_basic.css
391 ms
tt_address.css
392 ms
flexslider.css
394 ms
mobile.css
480 ms
results_old.css
482 ms
jquery-ui.custom.css
489 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
modernizr.js
488 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
55 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
521 ms
jquery.timelinr-0.9.54.js
522 ms
placeholder.js
574 ms
default.js
577 ms
newsslider.js
584 ms
FrontEnd.js
586 ms
cookies.js
586 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
588 ms
enable_swipebox.js
671 ms
javascript_9a38f34785.js
671 ms
forms.js
682 ms
e.js
339 ms
jquery.fineuploader-3.5.0.min.js
693 ms
suggest.js
692 ms
Validation.js
605 ms
Femanager.js
583 ms
logo.png
114 ms
ENDOCAM_Flex_HD_slider_1180x340px.jpg
204 ms
Disposables__slider_1180x340px.jpg
287 ms
TIPcontrol__slider_1180x340px.jpg
205 ms
csm_Slider_3DHD_14_04cc5c7a82.jpg
115 ms
csm_Slider_KeyPort_flex_14_c52523fa9a.jpg
181 ms
BOA_COBRA_vision__slider_1180x340px.jpg
391 ms
produkte.jpg
215 ms
service.jpg
280 ms
csm_HandListe_en_4004e9bcb5.jpg
306 ms
VeranstaltungenENG.jpg
307 ms
Startseite_TG_neu.jpg
316 ms
blendingscope_home2.png
376 ms
facebook.svg
382 ms
google.svg
402 ms
youtube.svg
403 ms
icon_search.png
408 ms
bg_footer-shadow.png
457 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
394 ms
265 ms
t.js
400 ms
icon_sliderdot-act.png
372 ms
icon_sliderdot-no.png
382 ms
icomoon.ttf
387 ms
richard-wolf.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
richard-wolf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
richard-wolf.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richard-wolf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Richard-wolf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richard-wolf.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richard Wolf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: