2.4 sec in total
105 ms
1.8 sec
510 ms
Visit richardfigures.com now to see the best up-to-date Richardfigures content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richardfigures.com
Become familiar with any kind of art with our universal blog. Info on architecture, music, fine arts, literature and even college writing help waits for you
Visit richardfigures.comWe analyzed Richardfigures.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
richardfigures.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
105 ms
222 ms
72 ms
101 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Richardfigures.com, 30% (27 requests) were made to Rackcdn.kikvid.com.s3.amazonaws.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (626 ms) relates to the external source Rackcdn.kikvid.com.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 966.0 kB (50%)
1.9 MB
975.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardfigures.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 778.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 162.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardfigures images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 531.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 531.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 237.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardfigures.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 237.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (44%)
79
44
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardfigures. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
105 ms
DickFigures
222 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css
72 ms
bootstrap.css
101 ms
font.css
69 ms
font-awesome.min.css
45 ms
volume.css
74 ms
slider.css
42 ms
pubsub.js
114 ms
jquery.min.js
115 ms
underscore-min.js
94 ms
main.js
92 ms
auth.js
90 ms
modal.js
114 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
113 ms
button.js
112 ms
button.js
111 ms
dialog_message.js
173 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
177 ms
bootstrap.min.js
174 ms
main.js
175 ms
main.js
175 ms
css
24 ms
css
44 ms
gpt.js
49 ms
thumb_2_480x270.jpg
206 ms
295f84140fa293042b2c5a7cae09d4cd.png
94 ms
4da81e041c16843fd1eed45a6b5aa836.jpg
186 ms
844fac7f0f2194fdd1cf5172b005e828.jpg
95 ms
play-icon.png
94 ms
72287413394a03f97de704f4b1ac5e77.jpg
182 ms
66e76f301926b3f7cd18034ac341ef97.jpg
181 ms
4b5a4e9e34bff80c581c2a57d7ddf7e7.jpg
182 ms
thumb_1_480x270.jpg
183 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
626 ms
thumb_0_480x270.jpg
270 ms
thumb_3_480x270.jpg
186 ms
thumb_0_480x270.jpg
184 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
186 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
367 ms
thumb_2_480x270.jpg
199 ms
thumb_3_480x270.jpg
194 ms
thumb_1_480x270.jpg
369 ms
thumb_3_480x270.jpg
198 ms
thumb_0_480x270.jpg
264 ms
thumb_0_480x270.jpg
264 ms
thumb_0_480x270.jpg
266 ms
thumb_0_480x270.jpg
265 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
265 ms
thumb_5_480x270.jpg
267 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
362 ms
thumb_5_480x270.jpg
365 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
366 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
366 ms
thumb_1_480x270.jpg
367 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
590 ms
thumb_4_480x270.jpg
387 ms
thumb_2_480x270.jpg
368 ms
thumb_1_480x270.jpg
387 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
170 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
170 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
170 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
101 ms
Y5yuUJGDLtmYv2_3fMB4fA.woff
98 ms
Fl4y0QdOxyyTHEGMXX8kcT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
99 ms
G1l_KMKj5pga7ZKths0iTfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
99 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
101 ms
sdk.js
166 ms
itunes_autolinkmaker.js
93 ms
analytics.js
91 ms
ads
231 ms
container.html
66 ms
collect
65 ms
px.gif
38 ms
collect
30 ms
px.gif
26 ms
24 ms
xd_arbiter.php
142 ms
xd_arbiter.php
252 ms
collect
60 ms
expansion_embed.js
14 ms
3245852523266409074
55 ms
abg.js
42 ms
m_js_controller.js
54 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
37 ms
osd.js
23 ms
s
24 ms
x_button_blue2.png
18 ms
ping
15 ms
ui
32 ms
richardfigures.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
richardfigures.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
richardfigures.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardfigures.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardfigures.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardfigures.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardfigures. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: