Tools & Wizards About Us
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

Website design which fulfills your needs not the designers'

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

386 ms

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Richardgreenweb Design content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

Would you like a website that gets results and provides a good Return On Investment, but will look great on all devices and be environmentally friendly?

Visit richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.264

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

206 ms

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

1259 ms

reset.css

161 ms

style.css

250 ms

538c625923a63.css

257 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.2 kB (18%)

Content Size

369.4 kB

After Optimization

303.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk main page is 369.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 167.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 53.9 kB

  • Original 69.2 kB
  • After minification 67.6 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 445 B

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardgreenweb Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 167.2 kB
  • After minification 167.2 kB
  • After compression 163.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 127.0 kB
  • After minification 127.0 kB
  • After compression 119.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardgreenweb Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

206 ms

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

1259 ms

reset.css

reset.css

161 ms

style.css

style.css

250 ms

538c625923a63.css

538c625923a63.css

257 ms

structure.css

structure.css

258 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

validationEngine.jquery.css

193 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

192 ms

go_portfolio_styles.css

go_portfolio_styles.css

275 ms

css

css

78 ms

ninja-contact-form.css

ninja-contact-form.css

276 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

273 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

441 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

286 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

493 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

421 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

336 ms

ninja-contact-form.min.js

ninja-contact-form.min.js

350 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

365 ms

tpbr_front.min.js

tpbr_front.min.js

416 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

431 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

615 ms

wide-rounded.css

wide-rounded.css

570 ms

intense_a1e005e4abba0da339f3430a97322cdce541972f.css

intense_a1e005e4abba0da339f3430a97322cdce541972f.css

566 ms

jquery.fitvids-max-width-modification.js

jquery.fitvids-max-width-modification.js

554 ms

init-fitvids.js

init-fitvids.js

554 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

555 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

558 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

568 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

579 ms

go_portfolio_scripts.js

go_portfolio_scripts.js

595 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

593 ms

custom_jquery_additions.js

custom_jquery_additions.js

702 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

698 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

698 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

699 ms

intense.icon.min.js

intense.icon.min.js

700 ms

intense.contentbox.min.js

intense.contentbox.min.js

699 ms

intense.animated.min.js

intense.animated.min.js

723 ms

css

css

20 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

31 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

489 ms

close.png

close.png

212 ms

closeblack.png

closeblack.png

212 ms

pixel.png

pixel.png

211 ms

35.png

35.png

211 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

447 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

457 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

465 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

461 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

459 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

463 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

460 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

462 ms

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

747 ms

ncf_icons.svg

ncf_icons.svg

89 ms

ncf_icons.woff

ncf_icons.woff

91 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

83 ms

style-mobile.css

style-mobile.css

89 ms

Accessibility Review

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richardgreenweb Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: