1.8 sec in total
132 ms
1.6 sec
57 ms
Welcome to richardsonrichardson.com homepage info - get ready to check Richardsonrichardson best content right away, or after learning these important things about richardsonrichardson.com
Headache-Free Construction Company in Albuquerque New Mexico!
Visit richardsonrichardson.comWe analyzed Richardsonrichardson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
richardsonrichardson.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value4.8 s
66/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
132 ms
32 ms
65 ms
72 ms
120 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Richardsonrichardson.com, 43% (21 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 24% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (727 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 539.9 kB (54%)
1.0 MB
464.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardsonrichardson.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 444.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 349.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 349.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardsonrichardson images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.0 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (28%)
36
26
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardsonrichardson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.richardsonrichardson.com
132 ms
minified.js
32 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
65 ms
polyfill.min.js
72 ms
thunderbolt-commons.5f3ef9f8.bundle.min.js
120 ms
main.055801ac.bundle.min.js
122 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
54 ms
lodash.min.js
120 ms
react.production.min.js
120 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
122 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
122 ms
R%26R_Logo_2-17_Web_3color.png
285 ms
bundle.min.js
61 ms
3510d7_6583c05d796246f5bebebc24fd69a0fe~mv2.jpg
219 ms
Image%20by%20Scott%20Blake.jpg
221 ms
Blueprint.jpg
172 ms
Pre-engineered_Steel_Logo.jpg
266 ms
3510d7_a753225483d7437f93964718cab4e931~mv2.jpg
320 ms
Golf_Tourn_2018.jpg
378 ms
Xcel_Logo.png
369 ms
Wendy's_Logo.png
364 ms
Schott_Logo.png
383 ms
UP_Logo.png
473 ms
ABQ_Logo.jpg
472 ms
Gardner_Zemke_Logo.png
577 ms
UNM_Logo.png
498 ms
Rio_Rancho_Logo.png
535 ms
La_Madeleine_Logo.png
544 ms
ABB_Logo.png
647 ms
WFM_Logo.png
631 ms
Innava_Logo.png
697 ms
Butler_Logo_New_White.png
727 ms
R%26R_Logo_2-17_Web_3color.png
643 ms
98 ms
95 ms
92 ms
95 ms
91 ms
91 ms
126 ms
128 ms
125 ms
123 ms
126 ms
126 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
23 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
8 ms
richardsonrichardson.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
richardsonrichardson.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
richardsonrichardson.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardsonrichardson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardsonrichardson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardsonrichardson.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardsonrichardson. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: