Tools & Wizards About Us
richardsroofinginc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

richardsroofinginc.com

Roofing Contractor Brevard County | Quality Roofing Solutions

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

273 ms

richardsroofinginc.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Richards Roofing Inc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richardsroofinginc.com

Richards’ Roofing Inc. is your trusted roofing contractor in the Brevard County, FL area with more than 20 years of quality roofing solutions and experience!

Visit richardsroofinginc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardsroofinginc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardsroofinginc.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richardsroofinginc.com

90 ms

richardsroofinginc.com

189 ms

index.html

34 ms

index.html

29 ms

index.html

113 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Richardsroofinginc.com, 39% (12 requests) were made to Img-fl.nccdn.net and 32% (10 requests) were made to 0201.nccdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (356 ms) relates to the external source Img-fl.nccdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 203.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Richardsroofinginc.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 142.8 kB

  • Original 164.3 kB
  • After minification 160.2 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 991.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richards Roofing Inc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 124.3 kB
  • After minification 112.1 kB
  • After compression 93.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richards Roofing Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richardsroofinginc.com

richardsroofinginc.com

90 ms

richardsroofinginc.com

richardsroofinginc.com

189 ms

index.html

index.html

34 ms

index.html

index.html

29 ms

index.html

index.html

113 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

28 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

41 ms

fat_core.EN.js

fat_core.EN.js

49 ms

env.js

env.js

356 ms

fat_eua.EN.js

fat_eua.EN.js

73 ms

fat_freemona.css

fat_freemona.css

67 ms

fat_freemona.js

fat_freemona.js

74 ms

fat_display.EN.js

fat_display.EN.js

89 ms

fat_display.js

fat_display.js

73 ms

fat_display.js

fat_display.js

114 ms

fat_display_item.js

fat_display_item.js

89 ms

styles.css

styles.css

107 ms

fat_slideshow_animated.EN.js

fat_slideshow_animated.EN.js

89 ms

logo.png

logo.png

63 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

30 ms

facebook_1.png

facebook_1.png

200 ms

yelp.png

yelp.png

198 ms

google_plus.png

google_plus.png

205 ms

reroofing-divider.png

reroofing-divider.png

202 ms

Quality_Roofing_Solutions.jpg

Quality_Roofing_Solutions.jpg

346 ms

Richards_Roofing_Owner_Richard_Geil.jpg

Richards_Roofing_Owner_Richard_Geil.jpg

82 ms

main-bg.jpg

main-bg.jpg

96 ms

header-bg_1.jpg

header-bg_1.jpg

112 ms

buttonbg.jpg

buttonbg.jpg

251 ms

PurlImage.ashx

PurlImage.ashx

329 ms

count.js

count.js

190 ms

Accessibility Review

richardsroofinginc.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

richardsroofinginc.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

richardsroofinginc.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardsroofinginc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardsroofinginc.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

richardsroofinginc.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richards Roofing Inc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: