6.6 sec in total
411 ms
1.4 sec
4.8 sec
Welcome to richardsweeney.com homepage info - get ready to check Richardsweeney best content right away, or after learning these important things about richardsweeney.com
Visit richardsweeney.comWe analyzed Richardsweeney.com page load time and found that the first response time was 411 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
richardsweeney.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value6.5 s
38/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
411 ms
87 ms
267 ms
289 ms
294 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Richardsweeney.com, 32% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (628 ms) belongs to the original domain Richardsweeney.com.
Page size can be reduced by 222.4 kB (19%)
1.2 MB
943.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardsweeney.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 886.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardsweeney images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 82.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardsweeney.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (47%)
15
8
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardsweeney. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richardsweeney.com
411 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
87 ms
css
267 ms
genericons.css
289 ms
style.css
294 ms
paypal.css
191 ms
jquery.js
272 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
192 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
202 ms
functions.js
280 ms
media-lib.jpg
270 ms
compass.jpg
208 ms
IMG_6384-1024x764.jpg
628 ms
IMG_63851-764x1024.jpg
599 ms
IMG_6386-1024x764.jpg
599 ms
fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9i3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
126 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPbOLyRJkM5aLlPlkJMOAyH0.ttf
208 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ19qQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
336 ms
erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
307 ms
BjAYBlHtW3CJxDcjzrnZCF02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
336 ms
AIed271kqQlcIRSOnQH0ySBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
335 ms
Genericons.svg
225 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
3 ms
HQXBIwLHsOJCNEQeX9kNz9qQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
331 ms
Wreg0Be4tcFGM2t6VWytvKp5NA6AAOjfQM_HmvD0shQ.ttf
333 ms
richardsweeney.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
richardsweeney.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
richardsweeney.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardsweeney.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Richardsweeney.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardsweeney.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richardsweeney. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: