47.7 sec in total
2.1 sec
45.2 sec
414 ms
Visit richeslink.com now to see the best up-to-date Richeslink content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richeslink.com
Visit richeslink.comWe analyzed Richeslink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 45.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
richeslink.com performance score
2089 ms
2862 ms
14134 ms
3690 ms
1072 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Richeslink.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Qiao.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Qiao.baidu.com.
Page size can be reduced by 124.1 kB (39%)
322.1 kB
198.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Richeslink.com main page is 322.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 162.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richeslink images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richeslink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (28%)
53
38
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richeslink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
richeslink.com
2089 ms
www.richeslink.com
2862 ms
sty.css
14134 ms
jquery-1.5.1.min.js
3690 ms
js.js
1072 ms
wpa.php
556 ms
hm.js
1131 ms
hm.js
2298 ms
top.png
1386 ms
logo.png
2349 ms
banner.jpg
19551 ms
banner-04.png
499 ms
banner-01.png
820 ms
banner-02.png
972 ms
banner-03.png
975 ms
cont1-01.jpg
12981 ms
cont4-01.png
2971 ms
cont4-02.png
2442 ms
cont4-03.png
5581 ms
cont4-04.png
3745 ms
cont4-05.png
2927 ms
cont4-06.png
3398 ms
cont5-01.png
4392 ms
cont6-01.png
3872 ms
cont6-02.png
4259 ms
cont6-05.png
4350 ms
1-16040Q44522502-lp.jpg
8084 ms
1-16040Q42220C5-lp.jpg
5333 ms
1-16040Q3400Y29-lp.jpg
6203 ms
1-16040G40232227-lp.jpg
8432 ms
1-16040G35TD16-lp.jpg
8906 ms
1-160405163U3N8-lp.jpg
8443 ms
QRcode.jpg
9645 ms
foot-bg1.png
9432 ms
foot-bg2.png
8940 ms
zxicon.png
9312 ms
erweima.png
9356 ms
mail.png
9811 ms
fanhui.png
9821 ms
Panel.js
693 ms
localStorage.js
705 ms
contains.js
451 ms
hm.gif
572 ms
r.cgi
2724 ms
get_kf_status.php
583 ms
ta.php
640 ms
crmqq.php
15898 ms
wpa_first_heart_beat.php
567 ms
hm.gif
431 ms
b.js
614 ms
bsl.js
3315 ms
Enter.php
823 ms
main_icon_invite_mess_api.js
20322 ms
main.css
575 ms
fix.css
1258 ms
version.js
3930 ms
hb.crm2.qq.com
610 ms
richeslink.com SEO score
N/A
ZH
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richeslink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that Richeslink.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
richeslink.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richeslink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: