2.7 sec in total
773 ms
1.6 sec
275 ms
Visit richmarkimports.com now to see the best up-to-date Richmark Imports content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richmarkimports.com
emerald rough, ruby rough, amethyst rough, wholesale gem rough, gem rough, cabbing rough, facet rough
Visit richmarkimports.comWe analyzed Richmarkimports.com page load time and found that the first response time was 773 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
richmarkimports.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
773 ms
56 ms
57 ms
59 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Richmarkimports.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Pics.ebay.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (773 ms) belongs to the original domain Richmarkimports.com.
Page size can be reduced by 305.2 kB (18%)
1.7 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Richmarkimports.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richmark Imports images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 217.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richmarkimports.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (39%)
46
28
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richmark Imports. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richmarkimports.com
773 ms
style.css
56 ms
mediaquery.css
57 ms
contact.css
59 ms
bjqs.css
58 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
92 ms
bjqs-1.3.min.js
83 ms
validation.js
83 ms
thickbox.css
85 ms
wpsc-default.css
84 ms
compatibility.css
109 ms
styles.css
109 ms
jquery.js
163 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
112 ms
wp-e-commerce.js
120 ms
index.php
571 ms
jquery.livequery.js
133 ms
user.js
134 ms
thickbox.js
137 ms
jquery.form.min.js
74 ms
scripts.js
84 ms
dot_clear.gif
327 ms
mainbg.jpg
66 ms
logo.png
84 ms
searchicon.png
68 ms
menubg.png
67 ms
sidebarbg1.png
67 ms
sidebarheadinbg.png
69 ms
linesprtsidebar.png
69 ms
150EmeraldRough.jpg
112 ms
amethystdark.jpg
138 ms
mixedgeodes.jpg
156 ms
ammonitesorthoceras.jpg
237 ms
greenfluorite.jpg
191 ms
productheadbg.png
110 ms
pro1.jpg
163 ms
pro2.jpg
191 ms
pro3.JPG
270 ms
pro4.jpg
245 ms
pro5.jpg
241 ms
pro6.jpg
271 ms
stars-5.gif
219 ms
stars-6.gif
247 ms
stars-7.gif
261 ms
leftarrow.png
206 ms
rightsidebar.png
215 ms
slidertxtbg.png
211 ms
consolas.woff
222 ms
bangla_sangam_mn-webfont.woff
230 ms
richmarkimports.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
richmarkimports.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
richmarkimports.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richmarkimports.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richmarkimports.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richmarkimports.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richmark Imports. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: