1 sec in total
159 ms
573 ms
270 ms
Welcome to richmondpaper.com homepage info - get ready to check Richmond Paper best content right away, or after learning these important things about richmondpaper.com
San Antonio’s business supply source for quality POS, Printer, Restaurant & Janitorial Supplies, delivered on-time and on-budget. Free area delivery over $50.
Visit richmondpaper.comWe analyzed Richmondpaper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 159 ms and then it took 843 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
richmondpaper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value4,300 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.497
16/100
15%
Value28.8 s
0/100
10%
159 ms
22 ms
18 ms
17 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Richmondpaper.com, 50% (20 requests) were made to Lib.store.yahoo.net and 30% (12 requests) were made to Ep.yimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (252 ms) relates to the external source Myaccount.richmondpaper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 265.2 kB (25%)
1.1 MB
798.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Richmondpaper.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 769.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richmond Paper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richmondpaper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (37%)
38
24
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richmond Paper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
richmondpaper.com
159 ms
jquery.js
22 ms
eyFadeMenus.js
18 ms
thickbox.js
17 ms
css
36 ms
richmond-2014-update.css
20 ms
thickbox.css
18 ms
globalScript.js
252 ms
ywa.js
55 ms
ey-bodyBG2.jpg
66 ms
trans_1x1.gif
32 ms
img-14615.gif
132 ms
img-14616.gif
172 ms
img-14617.gif
54 ms
img-14618.gif
42 ms
img-14619.gif
100 ms
cleaner-marvilloso-all-purpose-cleaner-gallon-bottles-12.gif
62 ms
multifold-paper-towels-2.gif
77 ms
brother-tn-450-compatible-black-toner-cartridge-5.gif
102 ms
portion-cup-2-oz-portion-cup-5.gif
69 ms
60-gallon-can-liners-38-x-60-high-density-coreless-rolls-14-mic-5.gif
90 ms
ey-header-14.jpg
27 ms
ey-searchSubmit-11.jpg
15 ms
ey-CartImage.jpg
25 ms
ey-featRowArr-11.jpg
24 ms
ey-divider.jpg
16 ms
ey-cards-11.jpg
16 ms
ey-richmondSlogan.jpg
24 ms
ey-bodyBG.jpg
57 ms
ey-rollover-bg-2014.jpg
68 ms
ey-dropdownBG.jpg
85 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
41 ms
img-14612.gif
87 ms
ey-featRowBG-11.jpg
80 ms
ey-footerBG-11.jpg
80 ms
ey-footerADot-11.jpg
78 ms
ga.js
26 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
43 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
478baf3a48f078794ce412dfdff8dc4d
39 ms
richmondpaper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
richmondpaper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
richmondpaper.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richmondpaper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Richmondpaper.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
richmondpaper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richmond Paper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: