5.2 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.2 sec
178 ms
Visit richmondprint.com now to see the best up-to-date Richmondprint content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richmondprint.com
Visit richmondprint.comWe analyzed Richmondprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
richmondprint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
1826 ms
175 ms
174 ms
315 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Richmondprint.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Richmondprint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 370.1 kB (29%)
1.3 MB
899.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Richmondprint.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 220.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Richmondprint needs image optimization as it can save up to 220.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 102.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richmondprint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (63%)
30
11
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richmondprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richmondprint.com
1826 ms
system.base.css
175 ms
system.menus.css
174 ms
system.messages.css
315 ms
system.theme.css
172 ms
comment.css
228 ms
field.css
274 ms
node.css
358 ms
search.css
359 ms
user.css
358 ms
style.css
440 ms
responsive.css
408 ms
jquery.js
668 ms
jquery.once.js
545 ms
drupal.js
593 ms
flexslider-min.js
622 ms
slide.js
620 ms
uniform.js
620 ms
superfish.js
684 ms
initialize.js
705 ms
responsive.js
742 ms
css
26 ms
bg.png
550 ms
facebook.png
120 ms
rss.png
123 ms
logo_1_0.png
347 ms
slide-image-1.jpg
289 ms
slide-image-2.jpg
291 ms
slide-image-3.jpg
463 ms
slide-image-4.jpg
565 ms
vintage.png
638 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
8 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
richmondprint.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
richmondprint.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richmondprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Richmondprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richmondprint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richmondprint. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: