6.5 sec in total
1.6 sec
3.8 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Ridgwaywatch content for Hong Kong. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ridgwaywatch.com
welcome
Visit ridgwaywatch.comWe analyzed Ridgwaywatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ridgwaywatch.com performance score
1633 ms
78 ms
74 ms
86 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Ridgwaywatch.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ridgwaywatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 292.0 kB (76%)
386.2 kB
94.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ridgwaywatch.com main page is 386.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 181.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridgwaywatch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 124.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridgwaywatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (65%)
66
23
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridgwaywatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ridgwaywatch.com
1633 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
78 ms
tubepress.css
74 ms
style.css
86 ms
jetpack.css
81 ms
jquery.js
156 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
116 ms
tubepress.js
146 ms
wordpress-ajax.js
153 ms
modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
153 ms
scripts.js
211 ms
buttons.js
14 ms
jscripts.php
254 ms
show_ads.js
9 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
54 ms
wpgroho.js
221 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
223 ms
wp-embed.min.js
223 ms
e-201611.js
7 ms
default.css
361 ms
css
26 ms
css
36 ms
css
45 ms
bg.jpg
126 ms
bg-nav.png
105 ms
bg-nav-r.png
114 ms
bg-nav-stripe.png
116 ms
icon-search.png
116 ms
bg-content.jpg
477 ms
fc24ad072e_ja-26346or-oo-d088cr-01-sdt-original.jpg
683 ms
9e43a1446f_slideshow-lead-6.jpg
556 ms
ae3267dd74_slideshow-lead-4.jpg
559 ms
df6778a498_arnold-son-nebula-rg-emo.jpg
630 ms
88c28205b3_reverso-tribute-duoface-background.jpg
712 ms
trans.png
548 ms
liner-widget.png
553 ms
rss.png
590 ms
KNiAlx6phRqXCwnZZG51JPEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
59 ms
Oiz0tNwvC-Nd29SBQWfWTC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
379 ms
wMZpbUtcCo9GUabw9JODep0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
407 ms
7jR1T900H5YEkd1UcZhA_fesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
407 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf
405 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
405 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
406 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
378 ms
ca-pub-1399073174924819.js
371 ms
zrt_lookup.html
391 ms
show_ads_impl.js
390 ms
bullet.png
505 ms
hovercard.css
178 ms
services.css
180 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
463 ms
g.gif
84 ms
ads
285 ms
osd.js
16 ms
m_js_controller.js
21 ms
abg.js
39 ms
favicon
82 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
73 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
42 ms
s
29 ms
x_button_blue2.png
17 ms
getSegment.php
180 ms
checkOAuth.esi
8 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
4 ms
t.dhj
5 ms
t.dhj
17 ms
cm
24 ms
x35248
101 ms
s-3271.xgi
5 ms
hbpix
70 ms
14 ms
11 ms
pixel
23 ms
2981
23 ms
52154.gif
5 ms
ridgwaywatch.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridgwaywatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ridgwaywatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ridgwaywatch.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ridgwaywatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: