25.9 sec in total
2.4 sec
22.7 sec
729 ms
Visit ridingabuttertub.com now to see the best up-to-date Ridingabuttertub content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ridingabuttertub.com
Visit ridingabuttertub.comWe analyzed Ridingabuttertub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 23.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
ridingabuttertub.com performance score
2446 ms
85 ms
119 ms
198 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Ridingabuttertub.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Entrecard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 209.8 kB (39%)
539.5 kB
329.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ridingabuttertub.com main page is 539.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 242.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridingabuttertub images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 141.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 141.3 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridingabuttertub.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (57%)
58
25
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridingabuttertub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ridingabuttertub.com
2446 ms
style.css
85 ms
styles.css
119 ms
jquery.js
198 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
138 ms
show_ads.js
9 ms
widget.js
149 ms
getnetworkwidget
94 ms
counter.js
16 ms
jquery.form.min.js
150 ms
scripts.js
149 ms
wp-embed.min.js
276 ms
tracking.js
9 ms
counter.asp
7 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
184 ms
ca-pub-6145688666434005.js
102 ms
zrt_lookup.html
107 ms
show_ads_impl.js
119 ms
logo_small.png
78 ms
127986367233859.1586.72089970.png
227 ms
bkg.gif
91 ms
top.png
171 ms
bbg.png
99 ms
logo.gif
87 ms
navbg.gif
79 ms
navbg-acho.gif
89 ms
rss.gif1
459 ms
s.gif
193 ms
go.gif
221 ms
comment.gif
193 ms
category.gif
193 ms
doth.gif
222 ms
dotv.gif
225 ms
h2.gif
238 ms
bullet.gif
237 ms
250_standard.html
20019 ms
footer.png
195 ms
ga.js
100 ms
ads
340 ms
osd.js
56 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
ads
349 ms
meter.asp
38 ms
analytics.js
256 ms
mpp.vindicosuite.com
238 ms
count.js
240 ms
beacon.js
115 ms
ads
333 ms
meter.asp
84 ms
0
135 ms
css
172 ms
m_js_controller.js
107 ms
abg.js
114 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
54 ms
6029304995352264446
52 ms
B9395775.129210506;dc_trk_aid=302130623;dc_trk_cid=69237417;ord=1426835612;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=
144 ms
17761507303378906038
129 ms
x_button_blue2.png
81 ms
s
80 ms
favicon
92 ms
mobile_unified_button_icon_white.png
32 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
15 ms
PuwvqkdbcqU-fCZ9Ed-b7S3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
46 ms
activeview
14 ms
activeview
17 ms
activeview
18 ms
ridingabuttertub.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridingabuttertub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ridingabuttertub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ridingabuttertub.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ridingabuttertub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: