5.6 sec in total
337 ms
4.8 sec
448 ms
Welcome to riemke.net homepage info - get ready to check Riemke best content right away, or after learning these important things about riemke.net
Enjoy mellow articles on web technology and funky podcast episodes on web development from the web technology professor Thorsten Riemke-Gurzki.
Visit riemke.netWe analyzed Riemke.net page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
riemke.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value2.3 s
94/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
337 ms
821 ms
154 ms
301 ms
351 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Riemke.net, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Riemke.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (70%)
3.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Riemke.net main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riemke images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riemke.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (72%)
64
18
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riemke. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riemke.net
337 ms
riemke.net
821 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
154 ms
admin_icon.min.css
301 ms
styles.css
351 ms
front.css
361 ms
default.css
365 ms
default.date.css
379 ms
wbk-frontend-default.css
377 ms
rgs.css
447 ms
font-awesome.min.css
703 ms
style.css
1154 ms
prettyPhoto.css
508 ms
responsive.css
733 ms
css
52 ms
select2.css
546 ms
dynamic-combined.css
598 ms
js_composer.min.css
863 ms
Defaults.css
798 ms
ultimate.min.css
967 ms
animate.min.css
846 ms
jquery.js
1090 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
943 ms
front.js
993 ms
core.min.js
1002 ms
effect.min.js
1092 ms
wbk-validator.js
1111 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
1141 ms
wbk-frontend.js
1217 ms
picker.js
1233 ms
picker.date.js
1243 ms
legacy.js
1257 ms
modernizr.js
1291 ms
ultimate.min.js
1422 ms
neutral.css
1326 ms
widget-neutral.css
1381 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1389 ms
scripts.js
1397 ms
nicescroll.js
1553 ms
prettyPhoto.js
1335 ms
superfish.js
1265 ms
init.js
1752 ms
nectar-slider.js
1316 ms
select2.min.js
1319 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
1225 ms
public.min.js
1323 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1250 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1241 ms
Prof-Riemke-Logo-3.png
357 ms
game-ampel-580-320.jpg
471 ms
riemke-kampffmeyers-stammtisch-b2.jpg
491 ms
digital-work-580-320.png
493 ms
gidt-riemke-friedrichsen.png
1269 ms
prof-riemke-web-250x250.jpg
598 ms
game-ampel-580-320-50x50.jpg
616 ms
riemke-kampffmeyers-stammtisch-b2-50x50.jpg
636 ms
digital-work-580-320-50x50.png
1264 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
31 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1236 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
63 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
1238 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
78 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1236 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
77 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1236 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1240 ms
button.png
1234 ms
piwik.js
1235 ms
icomoon.woff
1223 ms
diagonal_line.png
146 ms
grid.png
164 ms
slider_1-c.jpg
253 ms
cov3.jpg
272 ms
HdM-Wiese4-banner.jpg
483 ms
dynamic-combined.css
300 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
420 ms
riemke.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
riemke.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
riemke.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riemke.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Riemke.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riemke.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riemke. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: